make mkv price  - Free Activators

Ways to Get Free Adobe Photoshop CS6; Method 1 Without Serial Key or Activation What are the Major Restrictions in Adobe CS6? Conclusion. But here you can download free of cost. Makemkv activation key is a beautiful tool which allows converting any video into mkv format. Wikipedia is a free content, multilingual online encyclopedia written and maintained by a 2001, Sanger proposed on the Nupedia mailing list to create a wiki as a. make mkv price  - Free Activators

How to Get Free MakeMKV Beta Key/Lifetime Key/Registration Code

To use MakeMKV, you have to get MakeMKV registration key or MakeMKV beta code. MakeMKV is free while the software in beta. You can get its temporary beta key for free or buy the full activation/lifetime key. Find out MakeMKV free beta key here and ways to get the MakeMKV lifetime registration code key. Before you use MakeMKV key, you should know:

There is a gap between the expiry and new key.
MakeMKV only supports copying DVDs to MKV format.
MakeMKV always failed to rip Lionsgate DVDs coming with playlist obfuscation/fake playlists.

If you are unhappy with the situation, you can either wait for the new key or purchase a key. Or directly switch to other free yet better DVD ripping programs. Here we recommend a solid DVD ripper and share its free registration keys.

A Much Powerful DVD Ripper with Free Register Key (100% Work)

You have many DVD ripping programs that are much powerful than MakeMKV to choose from. WinX DVD Ripper Platinum is one of them. Free download WinX DVD Ripper Platinum and use the shared license code here to enjoy much faster and better DVD ripping experience.

  • Support much wider range of DVDs than MakeMKV, such as DVDs from Lionsgate, Disney, Warner Bros, Sony, etc.
  • Free copy and backup DVDs to MKV, as well as MP4, AVI, MOV, H.264, etc. with 350+ preset profiles.
  • Offer DVD backup mode, 1:1 backup DVDs to ISO image, TS folder, etc.
  • Support level-3 hardware acceleration, at least 5x faster than MakeMKV.

[OFFICIAL] WinX DVD Ripper Platinum Free License Code/Registration Key

Part 1: MakeMKV Temporary Free Beta Key 2021 [Updated]

The current MakeMKV beta key/code is

T-oDpQwQnTwMvNEFulk0.WkX0bkAPNZmCaKVNoWZv (valid until 2021-08-03)

This MakeMKV beta key is expired. You need to update the key every month. When the key is expired, users will get a message telling the version is out of date and asking for updating or registration. There's public API that automatically updates the beta key when it's available.

API

    You can automatically retrieve free MakeMKV Beta key in various variations:

  • api.php?json: For Web apps
  • api.php?xml: XML formatted output
  • api.php?text: For apps that lack json and xml parsers. Lines are in Name=Value
  • api.php?raw: For apps only require the key
  • api.php?reg: Windows Registry File for easy user import.

Part 2: Get MakeMKV Lifetime Full Registration/Activation Key

MakeMKV is free to convert DVDs without time limits. Ripping Blu-ray discs is a 30-days free trial. If you want to get the MakeMKV full activation key to make a digital copy of DVDs and Blu-ray discs, you have to purchase MakeMKV that is priced at $50. Use the steps below to buy the MakeMKV lifetime registration key.

  1. Go to the MakeMKV purchase page, click the Buy now button, fill in the information, pay for it, and receive MakeMKV registration key.
  2. Open MakeMKV on your computer.
  3. Click the Help button at to top menu bar and select Register from the drop-down menu.
  4. Use the full registration/activation key to enter it into MakeMKV.

Part 3: 2021 MakeMKV 1.16.4 Crack Full Registration Key/Serial Number

There's no evidence that MakeMKV can be cracked. MakeMKV cracking software isn't trustworthy. Instead of searching for methods to crack MakeMKV, use the above MakeMKV temporary beta key/code and update the key monthly for using freely. If you still want to get 2021 Make mkv price - Free Activators crack version, use the steps below and get the MakeMKV crack serial number/registration key.

How to Download and Install MakeMKV 1.16.4 Crack

  1. Download the latest version of MakeMKV and uninstall the previous version. Close all the antivirus programs and similar software.
  2. Go to a top-rated MakeMKV crack website, download Unpack or extracting a WinRAR file and open the configuration. Install the configuration after installation.
  3. Use the the MakeMKV serial registration key below to register MakeMKV. Now, you can use the MakeMKV crack version on your computer.

MakeMKV 1.16.4 Crack Registration Keys

  • MJV5X-SEC6V-YJV3D-TGA9M-MJC4X
  • JD3C6-GV2X9-LUV5R-NGZ3C-JFU6V
  • BGX2G-WS9K6-B4FZR-VD2A0-K1FZO

What's New in the latest MakeMKV v1.16.4 (8.7.2021)

Improved:

  • Ability to handle some discs with playlist obfuscation protection tech
  • Support for Mac OS 12.0 Monterey
  • Some other small improvements

Bug fixes:

  • Program failed to recognize some AAC streams with exotic channel encoding
  • Pictures were distored for some HEVC vieo streams
  • Program failed to rip and convert DVDs at the end

MakeMKV System Requirement

  • Windows: Windows 7/8/10 32/64-bit
  • macOS: macOS 10.12 Sierra - macOS 11.0 (Big Sur)
  • Processor: Intel Core i3-2100T @ 1.3GHz or AMD FX-4100 @2.5 GHz
  • Ram: A minimum of 4 GB for 8 GB RAM to Operate

Part 4: MakeMKV Registration Code Doesn't Work? What to Do

Many users complained on the Reddit and MakeMKV forum that the lifetime or beta key didn't work properly. Here's a real case: We've purchased a key for MakeMKV to allow for Bluray ripping, but the key doesn't work.

  1. Make sure you enter the registration key correctly into MakeMKV. Try typing the key instead of using copy & paste.
  2. Contact MakeMKV support to make sure the original key is valid.
  3. Use MakeMKV alternative program to rip and copy DVDs.

How to Rip and Copy DVDs with Free MakeMKV Alternative

Step 1. Free download WinX DVD Ripper Platinum on your computer and run it. Insert your DVD disc into DVD drive. Click the DVD Disc button at the top menu bar of the DVD ripper, choose your DVD disc to load. During the quick title reading process, the DVD ripper can recognize the right DVD title and select it automatically.

Step 2. The Output Profile windows appears when the DVD title is selected. Choose an output profile. MakeMKV only outputs MKV format, while WinX DVD Ripper offers lots of outputs with preset profiles for HDTVs, mobile devices, and more. You can copy DVDs to MP4 H.264, iPhone, iPad, hard drive, or back up DVDs to ISO images, TV folders.

Step 3. Click the RUN button to start copying DVDs. The MakeMKV alternative will finish ripping your DVD at super fast speed thanks to its support for multi-core CPU and GPU hardware acceleration.

rip DVDs with MakeMKV alternative

Part 5: FAQs on MakeMKV Registration/Activation Key

Is MakeMKV Still in Beta?

Yes. MakeMKV beta version is available to anyone at any time. You can go to MakeMKV official site to free download MakeMKV beta version and register it using MakeMKV beta key shared above. Open its website, you should see "Welcome to MakeMKV beta. The green "Download MakeMKV for Windows" button is on the left side of the website.

Is MakeMKV Still Free?

MakeMKV Beta version is free and can be activated using MakeMKV beta key. The program has freeware and shareware, and their functionality is different. The MakeMKV registration key listed here is valid for all versions on Windows/macOS/Linux. MakeMKV is a free limited DVD ripping software, which offers 30-day free trial.

Is MakeMKV Faster than Handbrake?

MakeMKV is SonicFire Pro License key than Handbrake since MakeMKV directly convert DVDs to MKV format, while Handbrake needs to re-encode the DVD file. HandBrake ripping speed depends more on the CPU power and settings. To Learn more comparison, check MakeMKV vs Handbrake in terms of DVD ripping speed, output quality, file Size and more.

Источник: https://www.winxdvd.com/dvd-ripper/makemkv-beta-lifetime-key.htm

iolo coupons and promo codes to buy System mechanic, driverscrubber for cheap. Get instant iolo activation code and serial key. iolo technologies is the popular brand that feature System Mechanic, DriveScrubber and many more. It uses activation key to optimize, repair and speed up your computer and other device. It was founded in 1998 and currently cover more than 33 countries by selling their digital goods in different local languages.

Top rated iolo Coupons and System Activation Key Codes

TWELVE – On account on their 12th Anniversary company is offering whopping 60% discount on Speed up your PC, Antispyware, Mechanic Professional and all other products.

Free PC Health Check – Now you can scans your entire PC for FREE and within few minutes they iolo will send you personalized report containing all the problems in your computer with suggestion to fix that.

FATHERSDAY – Use this limited time valid code to get their product for 65% off the regular price. Offer valid for selected time only.

iolomom or VDAY – Hurry up and use any of these offer codes to get System Mechanic 14.5 or Pro version at 70% discount. Valid for one time per customer per account.

FASTERPC – Receive 60% discount on their one year of service. Offer valid for first 1000 customers only.

Amazon and Walmart Deal – During the festival season, super store like eBay, Amazon, Kmart and Walmart feature software and other digital products from big brands like iolo, makemkv etc at huge discount. You should take benefit of such event to save your money.

SPRING14 or SPRING15 or BOXINGDAY – Sign in to your account and purchase 12.7 Pro version with the help of the codes given here to get it for $39.95 only, Regular price is $69.95.

Free Shipping – Company offer Free Standard Shipping on any order of $50 or more. Valid for US continental only and no need to apply any discount coupons.

4teen or EBRD – Validity is not known but if you are lucky enough then you can save 50% on your next online purchase. Offer valid for order from official website only.

$20 Off – Purchase System Mechanic or Pro version at $20 discount with Free search and recover tool. Offer is valid for new customers only.

How to get iolo Activation Key and Serial Codes?

If you are new customer or want to try their product then you just need to download your choice of product such as system shield antivirus, System Mechanic, Pro, PCTC, Premium or DriverScrubber. Now open their Free registration key page (i.e http://www.iolo.com/getkey/) and select your product name from drop down list. Then enter your email address and click on “Continue” button to receive free trial activation key on that email ID.

Once you get that key, you just need to apply that in your software to use it for FREE. It should be noted that Free Kms activator for microsoft office 2019 Discount is valid for few days only.

Each of the iolo Coupon Codes given here are valid once per account and depending on the promo codes, you will save anything from 20% to upto 70% off the retail price.

If you want to optimize and repair your computer by spending less amount then coupons are the only hope for you. Due to the nature of company, they regularly feature some highly profitable deals, promotional offers and exclusive event for their members. We are part of their group and update this page once in a week, so please check back us for more such working deals.

Originally posted 2019-11-29 05:07:27.

Affiliate Disclosure: We are a professional review and coupon site that receives compensation from companies and agencies who products we review. All our opinion are are own to help you choose the best. We earn a commission when you follow the link to make a purchase. We may earn money or products from the companies mentioned in this post.

Amazon Affiliate Disclosure: Feona is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Источник: http://giftcardspromocodes.com/435/iolo-system-mechanic-activation-key-coupon/

Wikipedia

Multilingual free online encyclopedia

This article is about Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's home page, see Main Page. For the English edition, see English Wikipedia. For a list of Wikipedias in other languages, see List of Wikipedias. For other uses, see Wikipedia (disambiguation).

"The Free Encyclopedia" redirects here. For the concept of a free encyclopedia, see Encyclopedia § Free encyclopedias.

Wikipedia (wik-ih-PEE-dee-ə or wik-ee-) is a free content, multilingual online encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of volunteers through a model of open collaboration, using a wiki-based editing system. Individual contributors, also called editors, are known as Wikipedians. It is the largest and most-read reference work in history,[3] and consistently one of the 15 most popular websites ranked by Alexa; as of 2021,[update] Wikipedia was ranked the 13th most popular site.[3][4] A visitor spends an average time on Wikipedia of 3 minutes and 45 seconds each day.[5] It is hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, an American non-profit organization funded mainly through small donations.[6]

Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001, by Jimmy Wales[7] and Larry Sanger; Sanger coined its name as a blending of "wiki" and "encyclopedia".[8] Initially available only in English, versions in other languages were quickly developed. Its combined editions comprise more than 57 million articles, attracting around 2 billion unique device visits per month, and more than 17 million edits per month (1.9 edits per second).[10][11] In 2006, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world", and is "a testament to the vision of one man, Jimmy Wales".[12]

Wikipedia has received praise for its enablement of the democratization of knowledge, extent of coverage, unique structure, culture, and reduced amount of commercial bias, but criticism for exhibiting systemic bias, particularly gender bias against women and alleged ideological bias.[13][14]Its reliability was frequently criticized in the 2000s, but has improved over time and has been generally praised in the late 2010s and early 2020s.[3][13][15] Its coverage of controversial topics such as American politics and major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic has received substantial media attention. It has been censored by world governments, ranging from specific pages to the entire site. It has become an element of popular culture, with references in books, films and academic studies. In 2018, Facebook and YouTube announced that they would help users detect fake news by suggesting fact-checking links to related Wikipedia articles.[16][17]

History

Main article: History of Wikipedia

Nupedia

Main article: Nupedia

Logo reading "Nupedia.com the free encyclopedia" in blue with the large initial "N"
Wikipedia originally developed from another encyclopedia project called Nupedia.

Other collaborative online encyclopedias were attempted before Wikipedia, but none were as successful.[18] Wikipedia began as a complementary project for Nupedia, a free online English-language encyclopedia project whose articles were written by experts and reviewed under a formal process.[19] It was founded on March 9, 2000, under the ownership of Bomis, a web portal company. Its main figures were Bomis CEO Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, editor-in-chief for Nupedia and later Wikipedia.[1][20] Nupedia was initially licensed under its own Nupedia Open Content License, but even before Wikipedia was founded, Nupedia switched to the GNU Free Documentation License at the urging of Richard Stallman.[21] Wales is credited with defining the goal of making a publicly editable encyclopedia,[22][23] while Sanger is credited with the strategy of using a wiki to reach that goal.[24] On January 10, 2001, Sanger proposed on the Nupedia mailing list to create a wiki as a "feeder" project for Nupedia.[25]

Launch and early growth

The domainswikipedia.com (later redirecting to wikipedia.org) and wikipedia.org were registered on January 12, 2001,[26] and January 13, 2001,[27] respectively, and Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001[19] as a single English-language edition at www.wikipedia.com,[28] and announced by Sanger on the Nupedia mailing list.[22] Its policy of "neutral point-of-view"[29] was codified in its first few months. Otherwise, there were initially relatively few rules, and it operated independently of Nupedia.[22] Bomis originally intended it as a business for profit.[30]

The Wikipedia home page on December 20, 2001

English Wikipedia editors with >100 edits per month[31]

Wikipedia gained early contributors from Nupedia, Slashdot postings, and web search engine indexing. Language editions were also created, with a total of 161 by the end of 2004.[33] Nupedia and Wikipedia coexisted until the former's servers were taken down permanently in 2003, and its text was incorporated into Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia passed the mark of two million articles on September 9, 2007, making it the largest encyclopedia ever assembled, surpassing the Yongle Encyclopedia made during the Ming Dynasty in 1408, which had held the record for almost 600 years.[34]

Citing fears of commercial advertising and lack of control, users of the Spanish Wikipediaforked from Wikipedia to create Enciclopedia Libre in February 2002.[35] Wales then announced that Wikipedia would not display advertisements, and changed Wikipedia's domain from wikipedia.com to wikipedia.org.[36][37]

Though the English Wikipedia reached three million articles in August 2009, the growth of the edition, in terms of the numbers of new articles and of editors, appears to have peaked around early 2007.[38] Around 1,800 articles were added daily to the encyclopedia in 2006; by 2013 that average was roughly 800.[39] A team at the Palo Alto Research Center attributed this slowing of growth to the project's increasing exclusivity and resistance to change.[40] Others suggest that the growth is flattening naturally because articles that could be called "low-hanging fruit"—topics that clearly merit an article—have already been created and built up extensively.[41][42][43]

In November 2009, a researcher at the Rey Juan Carlos University in Madrid found that the English Wikipedia had lost 49,000 editors during the first three months of 2009; in comparison, it lost only 4,900 editors during the same period in 2008.[44][45]The Wall Street Journal cited the array of rules applied to editing and disputes related to such content among the reasons for this trend.[46] Wales disputed these claims in 2009, denying the decline and questioning the study's methodology.[47] Two years later, in 2011, he acknowledged a slight decline, noting a decrease from "a little more than 36,000 writers" in June 2010 to 35,800 in June 2011. In the same interview, he also claimed the number of editors was "stable and sustainable".[48] A 2013 MIT Technology Review article, "The Decline of Wikipedia", questioned this claim, revealing that since 2007, Wikipedia had lost a third of its volunteer editors, and that those remaining had focused increasingly on minutiae.[49] In July 2012, The Atlantic reported that the number of administrators was also in decline.[50] In the November 25, 2013, issue of New York magazine, Katherine Ward stated, "Wikipedia, the sixth-most-used website, is facing an internal crisis."[51]

Milestones

Cartogramshowing number of articles in each European language as of January 2019.[update]One square represents 10,000 articles. Languages with fewer than 10,000 articles are represented by one square. Languages are grouped by language family and each language family is presented by a separate color.

In January 2007, Wikipedia first became one of the ten most popular websites in the US, according to comscore Networks. With 42.9 million unique visitors, it was ranked #9, surpassing The New York Times (#10) and Apple (#11). This marked a significant increase over January 2006, when Wikipedia ranked 33rd, with around 18.3 million unique visitors.[52] As of March 2020[update], it ranked 13th[4] in popularity according to Alexa Internet. In 2014, it received eight billion page views every month.[53] On February 9, 2014, The New York Times reported that Wikipedia had 18 billion page views and nearly 500 million unique visitors a month, "according to the ratings firm comScore".[10] Loveland and Reagle argue that, in process, Wikipedia follows a long tradition of historical encyclopedias that have accumulated improvements piecemeal through "stigmergic accumulation".[54][55]

On January 18, 2012, the English Wikipedia participated in a series of coordinated protests against two proposed laws in the United States Congress—the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA)—by blacking out its pages for 24 hours.[56] More than 162 million people viewed the blackout explanation page that temporarily replaced its content.[57][58]

On January 20, 2014, Subodh Varma reporting for The Economic Times indicated that not only had Wikipedia's growth stalled, it "had lost nearly ten percent of its page views last year. There was a decline of about two billion between December 2012 and December 2013. Its most popular versions are leading the slide: page-views of the English Wikipedia declined by twelve percent, those of German version slid by 17 percent and the Japanese version lost nine percent."[59] Varma added, "While Wikipedia's managers think that this could be due to errors in counting, other experts feel that Google's Knowledge Graphs project launched last year may be gobbling up Wikipedia users."[59] When contacted on this matter, Clay Shirky, associate professor at New York University and fellow at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society said that he suspected much of the page-view decline was due to Knowledge Graphs, stating, "If you can get your question answered from the search page, you don't need to click [any further]."[59] By the end of December 2016, Wikipedia was ranked the 5th most popular website globally.[60]

In January 2013, 274301 Wikipedia, an asteroid, was named after Wikipedia; in October 2014, Wikipedia was honored with the Wikipedia Monument; and, in July 2015, 106 of the 7,473 700-page volumes of Wikipedia became available as Print Wikipedia. In April 2019, an Israeli lunar lander, Beresheet, crash landed on the surface of the Moon carrying a copy of nearly all of the English Wikipedia engraved on thin K-Lite Mega Codec Pack Keygen - Crack Key For U plates; experts say the plates likely survived the crash.[61][62] In June 2019, scientists reported that all 16 GB of article text from the English Wikipedia had been encoded into synthetic DNA.[63]

Current state

On January 23, 2020, the English-language Wikipedia, which is the largest language section of the online encyclopedia, published its six millionth article.

By February 2020, Wikipedia ranked eleventh in the world in terms of Internet traffic.[64] As a key resource for disseminating information related to COVID-19, the World Health Organization has partnered with Wikipedia to help combat the spread of misinformation.[65][66]

Wikipedia accepts cryptocurrency donations and Basic Attention Token.[67][68][69]

Openness

Differences between versions of an article are highlighted

Unlike traditional encyclopedias, Wikipedia follows the procrastination principle[note 3] regarding the security of spyhunter 5 torrent content.[70]

Restrictions

Due to Wikipedia's increasing popularity, some editions, including the English version, have introduced editing restrictions for certain cases. For instance, on the English Wikipedia and some other language editions, only registered users may create a new article.[71] On the English Wikipedia, among others, particularly controversial, sensitive or vandalism-prone pages have been protected to varying degrees.[72][73] A frequently vandalized article can be "semi-protected" or "extended confirmed protected", meaning that only "autoconfirmed" or "extended confirmed" editors can modify it.[74] A particularly contentious article may be locked so that only administrators can make changes.[75] A 2021 article in the Columbia Journalism Review identified Wikipedia's page-protection policies as "[p]erhaps the most important" means at its disposal to "regulate its market of ideas".[76]

In certain cases, all editors are allowed to submit modifications, but review is required for some editors, depending on certain conditions. For example, the German Wikipedia maintains "stable versions" of articles[77] which have passed certain reviews. Following protracted trials and community discussion, the English Wikipedia introduced the "pending changes" system in December 2012. Under this system, new and unregistered users' edits to certain controversial or vandalism-prone articles are reviewed by established users before they are published.[79]

Wikipedia's editing interface

Review of changes

Although changes are not systematically reviewed, the software that powers Wikipedia provides tools allowing anyone to review changes made by others. Each article's History page links to each revision.[note 4][80] On most articles, anyone can undo others' changes by clicking a link on the article's History page. Anyone can view the latest changes to articles, and anyone registered may maintain a "watchlist" of articles that interest them so they can be notified of changes. "New pages patrol" is a process where newly created articles are checked for obvious problems.[81]

In 2003, economics Ph.D. student Andrea Ciffolilli argued that the low transaction costs of participating in a wiki created a catalyst for collaborative development, and that features such as allowing easy access to past versions of a page favored "creative construction" over "creative destruction".[82]

Vandalism

Main article: Vandalism on Wikipedia

Any change or edit that manipulates content in a way that purposefully compromises Wikipedia's integrity is considered vandalism. The most common and obvious types of vandalism include additions of obscenities and crude humor; it can also include advertising and other types of spam.[83] Sometimes editors commit vandalism by removing content or entirely blanking a given page. Less common types of vandalism, such as the deliberate addition of plausible but false information, can be more difficult to detect. Vandals can introduce irrelevant formatting, modify page semantics such as the page's title or categorization, manipulate the article's underlying code, or use images disruptively.[84]

Obvious vandalism is generally easy to remove from Wikipedia articles; the median time to detect and fix it is a few minutes.[85][86] However, some vandalism takes much longer to detect and repair.[87]

In the Seigenthaler biography incident, an anonymous editor introduced false information into the biography of American political figure John Seigenthaler in May 2005, falsely presenting him as a suspect in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.[87] It remained uncorrected for four months.[87] Seigenthaler, the founding editorial director of USA Today and founder of the Freedom ForumFirst Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University, called Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales and asked whether he had any way of knowing who contributed the misinformation. Wales said he did not, although the perpetrator was eventually traced.[88][89] After the incident, Seigenthaler described Wikipedia as "a flawed and irresponsible research tool".[87] The incident led to policy changes at Wikipedia for tightening up the verifiability of biographical articles of living people.[90]

In 2010, Daniel Tosh encouraged viewers of his show, Tosh.0, to visit the show's Wikipedia article and edit it at will. On a later episode, he commented on the edits to the article, most of them offensive, which had been made by the audience and had prompted the article to be locked from editing.[91][92]

Edit warring

Wikipedians often have disputes regarding content, which make mkv price - Free Activators result in repeated competing changes to an article, known as "edit warring".[93][94] It is widely seen as a resource-consuming scenario where no useful knowledge is added,[95] and criticized as creating a competitive[96] and conflict-based[97] editing culture associated with traditional masculine gender roles.[98]

Policies and laws

Content in Wikipedia is subject to the laws (in particular, copyright laws) of the United States and of the US state of Virginia, where the majority of Wikipedia's servers are located. Beyond legal matters, the editorial principles of Wikipedia are embodied in the "five pillars" and in numerous policies and guidelines intended to appropriately shape content. Even these rules are stored in wiki form, and Wikipedia editors write and revise the website's policies and guidelines.[99] Editors can enforce these rules by deleting or modifying non-compliant material. Originally, rules on the non-English editions of Wikipedia were based on a translation of the rules for the English Wikipedia. They have since diverged to some extent.[77]

Content policies and guidelines

According to the rules on the English Wikipedia, each entry in Wikipedia must be about a topic that is encyclopedic and is not a dictionary entry or dictionary-style.[100] A topic should also meet Wikipedia's standards of "notability",[101] which generally means that the topic must have been covered in mainstream media or major academic journal sources that are independent of the article's subject. Further, Wikipedia intends to convey only knowledge that is already established and recognized.[102] It must not present original research. A claim that is likely to be challenged requires a reference to a reliable source. Among Wikipedia editors, this is often phrased as "verifiability, not truth" to express the idea that the readers, not the encyclopedia, are ultimately responsible for checking the truthfulness of the articles and making their own interpretations.[103] This make mkv price - Free Activators at times lead to the removal of information that, though valid, is not properly sourced.[104] Finally, Wikipedia must not take sides.[105]

Governance

Further information: Wikipedia:Administration

Wikipedia's initial anarchy integrated democratic and hierarchical elements over time.[106][107] An article is not considered to be owned by its creator or any other editor, nor by the subject of the article.[108]

Administrators

Editors in good standing in the community can request extra user rights, granting them the technical ability to perform certain special actions. In particular, editors can choose to run for "adminship",[109][110] which includes the Recovery Explorer Professional 8.8 Free Download with Crack to delete pages or prevent them from being changed in cases of severe vandalism or editorial disputes. Administrators are not supposed to enjoy any special privilege in decision-making; instead, their powers are mostly limited to making edits that have project-wide effects and thus are disallowed to ordinary editors, and to implement restrictions intended to prevent disruptive editors from making unproductive edits.[111][112]

By 2012, fewer editors were becoming administrators compared to Wikipedia's earlier years, in part because the process of vetting potential administrators had become more rigorous.[113]

Dispute resolution

Over time, Wikipedia has developed a semiformal dispute resolution process. To determine community consensus, editors can raise issues at appropriate community forums,[note 5] seek outside input through third opinion requests, or initiate a more general community discussion known as a "request for comment".

Arbitration Committee

Main article: Arbitration Committee

The Arbitration Committee presides over the ultimate dispute resolution process. Although disputes usually arise from a disagreement between two opposing views on how an article should read, the Arbitration Committee explicitly refuses to directly rule on the specific view that should be adopted. Statistical analyses suggest that the committee ignores the content of disputes and rather focuses on the way disputes are conducted,[114] functioning not so much to resolve disputes and make peace between conflicting editors, but to weed out problematic editors while allowing potentially productive editors back in to participate. Therefore, the committee does not dictate the content of articles, although it sometimes condemns content changes when it deems the new content violates Wikipedia policies (for example, if the new content is considered biased). Its remedies include cautions and probations (used in 63% of cases) and banning editors from articles (43%), subject matters (23%), or Wikipedia (16%).[when?] Complete bans from Wikipedia are generally limited to instances of impersonation and anti-social behavior. When conduct is not impersonation or anti-social, but rather anti-consensus or in violation of editing policies, remedies tend to be limited to warnings.[115]

Main article: Wikipedia community

Each article and each user of Wikipedia has an associated "talk" page. These form the primary communication channel for editors to discuss, coordinate and debate.[116]

Wikipedia's community has been described as cultlike,[117] although not always with entirely negative connotations.[118] Its preference for cohesiveness, even if it requires compromise that includes disregard of credentials, has been referred to as "anti-elitism".[119]

Wikipedians sometimes award one another "virtual barnstars" for good work. These personalized tokens of appreciation reveal a wide range of valued work extending far beyond simple editing to include social support, administrative actions, and types of articulation work.[120]

Wikipedia does not require that its editors and contributors provide identification.[121] As Wikipedia grew, "Who writes Wikipedia?" became one of the questions frequently asked there.[122] Jimmy Wales once argued that only "a community . a dedicated group of a few hundred volunteers" makes the bulk of contributions to Wikipedia and that the project is therefore "much like any traditional organization".[123] In 2008, a Slate magazine article reported that: "According to researchers in Palo Alto, one percent of Wikipedia users are responsible for about half of the site's edits."[124] This method of evaluating contributions was later disputed by Aaron Swartz, who noted that several articles he sampled had large portions of their content (measured by number of characters) contributed by users with low edit counts.[125]

The English Wikipedia has 6,409,211 articles, 42,559,880 registered editors, and 125,342 active editors. An editor is considered active if they have made one or more edits in the past 30 days.

Editors who fail to comply with Wikipedia cultural rituals, such as signing talk page comments, may implicitly signal that they are Wikipedia outsiders, increasing the odds that Wikipedia insiders may target or discount their contributions. Becoming a Wikipedia insider involves non-trivial costs: the contributor is expected to learn Wikipedia-specific technological codes, submit to a sometimes convoluted dispute resolution process, and learn a "baffling culture rich with in-jokes and insider references".[126] Editors who do not log in are in some sense second-class citizens on Wikipedia,[126] as "participants are accredited by members of the wiki community, who have a vested interest in preserving the quality of the work product, on the basis of their ongoing participation",[127] but the contribution histories of anonymous unregistered editors recognized only by their IP make mkv price - Free Activators cannot be attributed to a particular editor with certainty.

Studies

A 2007 study by researchers from Dartmouth College found that "anonymous and infrequent contributors to Wikipedia . are as reliable a source of knowledge as those virtual dj pro infinity crack - Crack Key For U who register with the site".[128] Jimmy Wales stated in 2009 that "[I]t turns out over 50% of all the edits are done by just .7% of the users . 524 people . And in fact, the most active 2%, which is 1400 people, have done 73.4% of all the edits."[123] However, Business Insider editor and journalist Henry Blodget showed in 2009 that in a random sample of articles, most Wikipedia content (measured by the amount of contributed text that survives to the latest sampled edit) is created by "outsiders", while most editing and formatting is done by "insiders".[123]

A 2008 study found that Wikipedians were less agreeable, open, and conscientious than others,[129][130] although a later commentary pointed out serious flaws, including that the data showed higher openness and that the differences with the control group and the samples were small.[131] According to a 2009 study, there is "evidence of growing resistance from the Wikipedia community to new content".[132]

Diversity

Several studies have Geekbench Pro 5.4.1 Crack+ Serial Key Free Download 2021 that most Wikipedia contributors are male. Notably, the results of a Wikimedia Foundation survey in 2008 showed that only 13 percent of Wikipedia editors were female.[133] Because of this, universities throughout the United States tried to encourage women to become Wikipedia contributors. Similarly, many of these universities, including Yale and Brown, gave college credit to students who create or edit an article relating to women in science or technology.[134]Andrew Lih, a professor and scientist, wrote in The New York Times that the reason he thought the number of male contributors outnumbered the number of females so greatly was because identifying as a woman may expose oneself to "ugly, intimidating behavior".[135] Data has shown that Africans are underrepresented among Wikipedia editors.[136]

Language editions

Main article: List of Wikipedias

Most popular edition of Wikipedia by country in January 2021.
Most viewed editions of Wikipedia over time.
Most edited editions of Wikipedia over time.

There are currently 325 language editions of Wikipedia (also called language versions, or simply Wikipedias). As of November 2021, the six largest, in order of article count, are the English, Cebuano, Swedish, German, French, and Dutch Wikipedias.[138] The second and third-largest Wikipedias owe their position to the article-creating botLsjbot, which as of 2013[update] had created about half the articles on the Swedish Wikipedia, and most of the articles in the Cebuano and Waray Wikipedias. The latter are both languages of the Philippines.

In addition to the top six, twelve other Wikipedias have more than a million articles each (Russian, Spanish, Italian, Polish, Egyptian Arabic, Japanese, Vietnamese, Waray, Chinese, Arabic, Ukrainian and Portuguese), seven more have over 500,000 articles (Persian, Catalan, Serbian, Indonesian, Norwegian, Korean and Finnish), 44 more have over 100,000, and 82 more have over 10,000.[139][138] The largest, the English Wikipedia, has over 6.4 million articles. As of January 2021,[update] the English Wikipedia receives 48% of Wikipedia's make mkv price - Free Activators traffic, with the remaining split among the other languages. The top 10 editions represent approximately 85% of the total traffic.[140]

0.1 0.3 1 3

English 6,409,211

Cebuano 6,060,605

Swedish 2,876,323

German 2,632,800

French 2,374,515

Dutch 2,071,460

Russian 1,770,848

Spanish 1,731,290

Italian 1,726,231

Polish 1,496,695

Egyptian Arabic 1,372,525

Japanese 1,300,750

Vietnamese 1,270,057

Waray 1,265,573

Chinese 1,241,305

Arabic 1,143,069

Ukrainian 1,122,940

Portuguese 1,077,306

Persian 846,511

Catalan 689,573

The unit for the numbers in bars is articles.

Since Wikipedia is based on the Web and therefore worldwide, contributors to the same language edition may use different dialects or may come from different countries (as is the case for the English edition). These differences may lead to some conflicts over spelling differences (e.g. colour versus color)[142] or points of view.[143]

Though the various language editions are held to global policies such as "neutral point of view", they diverge on some points of policy and practice, most notably on whether images that are not licensed freely may be used under a claim of fair use.[144][145][146]

Jimmy Wales has described Wikipedia as "an effort to create and distribute a free encyclopedia of the highest possible quality to every single person on the planet in their own language".[147] Though each language edition functions more or less independently, some efforts are made to supervise them all. They are coordinated in part by Meta-Wiki, the Wikimedia Foundation's wiki devoted to maintaining all its projects (Wikipedia and others).[148] For instance, Meta-Wiki provides important statistics on all language editions of Wikipedia,[149] and it maintains a list of articles every Wikipedia should have.[150] The list concerns basic content by subject: biography, history, geography, society, culture, science, technology, and mathematics. It is not rare for articles strongly related to a particular language not to have counterparts in another edition. For example, articles about small towns in the United States might be available only in English, even when they meet the notability criteria of other language Wikipedia projects.

Estimation of contributions shares from different regions in the world to different Wikipedia editions[151]

Translated articles represent only a small portion of articles in most editions, in part because those editions do not allow fully automated translation of articles. Articles available in more than one language may offer "interwiki links", which link to the counterpart articles in other editions.[citation needed]

A study published by PLOS One in 2012 also estimated the share of contributions to different editions of Wikipedia from different regions of the world. It reported that the proportion of the edits made from North America was 51% for the English Wikipedia, and 25% for the simple English Wikipedia.[151]

English Wikipedia editor numbers

Number of editors on the English Wikipedia over time.

On March 1, 2014, The Economist, in an article titled "The Future of Wikipedia", cited a trend analysis concerning data published by the Wikimedia Foundation stating that "[t]he number of editors for the English-language version has fallen by a third in seven years."[152] The attrition rate for active editors in English Wikipedia was cited by The Economist as substantially in contrast to statistics for Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia). The Economist reported that the number of contributors with an average of five or more edits per month was relatively constant since 2008 for Wikipedia in other languages at approximately 42,000 editors within narrow seasonal variances of about 2,000 editors up or down. The number of Adobe Acrobat Pro DC 2021.05.2058 Crack Free Download [Latest] editors in English Wikipedia, by sharp comparison, was cited as peaking in 2007 at approximately 50,000 and dropping to 30,000 by the start of 2014.

In contrast, the trend analysis published in The Economist presents Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) as successful in retaining their active editors on a renewable and sustained basis, with their numbers remaining relatively constant at approximately 42,000.[152] No comment was made concerning which of the differentiated edit policy standards from Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) would provide a possible alternative to English Wikipedia for effectively ameliorating substantial editor attrition rates on the English-language Wikipedia.[153]

Reception

See also: Academic studies about Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia

Ambox current red Americas.svg

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2018)

Various Wikipedians have criticized Wikipedia's large and growing regulation, which includes more than fifty policies and nearly 150,000 words as of 2014.[update][154][155]

Critics have stated that Wikipedia exhibits systemic bias. In 2010, columnist and journalist Edwin Black described Wikipedia as being a mixture of "truth, half-truth, and some falsehoods".[156] Articles in The Chronicle of Higher Education and The Journal of Academic Librarianship have criticized Wikipedia's "Undue Weight" policy, concluding that the fact that Wikipedia explicitly is not designed to provide correct information about a subject, but rather focus on all the major viewpoints on the subject, give less attention to minor ones, and creates omissions that can lead to false beliefs based on incomplete information.[157][158][159]

Journalists Oliver Kamm and Edwin Black alleged (in 2010 and 2011 respectively) that articles are dominated by the loudest and most persistent voices, usually by a group with an "ax to grind" on the topic.[156][160] A 2008 article in Education Next Journal concluded that as a resource about controversial topics, Wikipedia is subject to manipulation and spin.[161]

In 2020, Omer Benjakob and Stephen Harrison noted that "Media coverage of Wikipedia has radically shifted over the past two decades: once cast as an intellectual frivolity, it is now lauded as the 'last bastion of shared reality' online."[162]

In 2006, the Wikipedia Watch criticism website listed dozens of examples of plagiarism in the English Wikipedia.[163]

Accuracy of content

Main article: Reliability of Wikipedia

Articles for traditional encyclopedias such as Encyclopædia Britannica are written by experts, lending such encyclopedias a reputation for accuracy.[164] However, a peer review in 2005 of forty-two scientific entries on both Wikipedia and Encyclopædia Britannica by the science journal Nature found few differences in accuracy, and concluded that "the average science entry in Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies; Britannica, about three."[165] Joseph Reagle suggested that while the study reflects "a topical strength of Wikipedia contributors" in science articles, "Wikipedia may not have fared so well using a random sampling of articles or on humanities subjects."[166] Others raised similar critiques.[167] The findings by Nature were disputed by Encyclopædia Britannica,[168][169] and in response, Nature gave a rebuttal of the points raised by Britannica.[170] In addition to the point-for-point disagreement between these two parties, others have examined the sample size and selection method used in the Nature effort, and suggested a "flawed study design" (in Nature's manual selection of articles, in part or in whole, for comparison), absence of statistical analysis (e.g., of reported confidence intervals), and a lack of study "statistical power" (i.e., owing to small sample size, 42 or 4 × 101 articles compared, vs >105 and >106 set sizes for Britannica and the English Wikipedia, respectively).[171]

As a consequence of the open structure, Wikipedia "makes no guarantee of validity" of its content, since no one is ultimately responsible for any claims appearing in it.[172] Concerns have been raised by PC World in 2009 regarding the lack of accountability that results from users' anonymity,[173] the insertion of false information,[174]vandalism, and similar problems.

Economist Tyler Cowen wrote: "If I had to guess whether Wikipedia or the median refereed journal article on economics was more likely to be true after a not so long think I would opt for Wikipedia." He comments that some traditional sources of non-fiction suffer from systemic biases, and novel results, in his opinion, are over-reported in journal articles Smart Game Booster Pro Crack well as relevant information being omitted from news reports. However, he also cautions that errors are frequently found on Internet sites and that academics and experts must be vigilant in correcting them.[175]Amy Bruckman has argued that, due to the number of reviewers, "the content of a popular Wikipedia page is actually the most reliable form of information ever created".[176]

Critics argue that Wikipedia's open nature and a lack of proper sources for most of the information makes it unreliable.[177] Some commentators suggest that Wikipedia may be reliable, but that the reliability of any given article is not clear.[178] Editors of traditional reference works such as the Encyclopædia Britannica have questioned the project's utility and status as an encyclopedia.[179] Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has claimed that Wikipedia has largely avoided the problem of "fake news" because the Wikipedia community regularly debates the quality of sources in articles.[180]

Wikipedia's open structure inherently makes it an easy target for Internet trolls, spammers, and various forms of paid advocacy seen as counterproductive to the maintenance of a neutral and verifiable online encyclopedia.[80][182] In response to paid advocacy editing and undisclosed editing issues, Wikipedia was reported in an article in The Wall Street Journal, to have strengthened its rules and laws against undisclosed vpn unlimited 5.4 crack - Free Activators The article stated that: "Beginning Monday [from the date of the article, June 16, 2014], changes in Wikipedia's terms of use will require anyone paid to edit articles to disclose that arrangement. Katherine Maher, the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation's chief communications officer, said the changes address a sentiment among volunteer editors that, 'we're not an advertising service; we're an encyclopedia.'"[183][184][185][186][187] These issues, among others, had been parodied since the first decade of Wikipedia, notably by Stephen Colbert on The Colbert Report.[188]

A Harvard law textbook, Legal Research in a Nutshell (2011), cites Dvdfab full version free download - Crack Key For U as a "general source" that "can be a real boon" in "coming up to speed in the law governing a situation" and, "while not authoritative, can provide basic facts as well as leads to more in-depth resources".[189]

Discouragement in education

Ambox current red Americas.svg

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(December 2020)

Most university lecturers discourage students from citing any encyclopedia in academic work, preferring primary sources;[190] some specifically prohibit Wikipedia citations. Wales stresses that encyclopedias of any type are not usually appropriate to use as citable sources, and should not be relied upon as authoritative.[193] Wales once (2006 or earlier) said he receives about ten emails weekly from students saying they got failing grades on papers because they cited Wikipedia; he told the students they got what they deserved. "For God's sake, you're in college; don't cite the encyclopedia," he said.[194]

In February 2007, an article in The Harvard Crimson newspaper reported that a few of the professors at Harvard University were including Wikipedia articles in their syllabi, although without realizing the articles might change.[195] In June 2007, former president of the American Library AssociationMichael Gorman condemned Wikipedia, along with Google,[196] stating that academics who endorse the use of Wikipedia are "the intellectual equivalent of a dietitian who recommends a steady diet of Big Macs with everything".

In contrast, academic writing[clarification needed] in Wikipedia has evolved in recent years and has been found to increase student interest, personal connection to the product, creativity in material processing, and international collaboration in the learning process.[197]

Medical information

See also: Health information on Wikipedia

On March 5, 2014, Julie Beck writing for The Atlantic magazine in an article titled "Doctors' #1 Source for Healthcare Information: Wikipedia", stated that "Fifty percent of physicians look up conditions on the (Wikipedia) site, and some are editing articles themselves to improve the quality of available information."[198] Beck continued to detail in this article new programs of Amin Azzam at the University of San Francisco to offer medical school courses to medical students for learning to edit and improve Wikipedia articles on health-related issues, as well as internal quality control programs within Wikipedia organized by James Heilman to improve a group of 200 health-related articles of central medical importance up to Wikipedia's highest standard of articles using make mkv price - Free Activators Featured Article and Good Article peer-review evaluation process.[198] In a May 7, 2014, follow-up article in The Atlantic titled "Can Wikipedia Ever Be a Definitive Medical Text?", Julie Beck quotes WikiProject Medicine's James Heilman as stating: "Just because a reference is peer-reviewed doesn't mean it's a high-quality reference."[199] Beck added that: "Wikipedia has its own peer review process before articles can be classified as 'good' or 'featured'. Heilman, who has participated in that process before, says 'less than one percent' of Wikipedia's medical articles have passed."[199]

Quality of writing

Screenshot of English Wikipedia's article on Earth, a featured-class article

In a 2006 mention of Jimmy Wales, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world".[200]

In 2008, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University found that the quality of a Wikipedia article would suffer rather than gain from adding more writers when the article lacked appropriate explicit or implicit coordination.[201] For instance, when contributors rewrite small portions of an entry rather than making full-length revisions, high- and low-quality content may be intermingled within an entry. Roy Rosenzweig, a history professor, stated that American National Biography Online outperformed Wikipedia in terms of its "clear and engaging prose", which, he said, was an important aspect of good historical writing.[202] Contrasting Wikipedia's treatment of Abraham Lincoln to that of Civil War historian James McPherson in American National Biography Online, he said that both were essentially accurate and covered the major episodes in Lincoln's life, but praised "McPherson's richer contextualization . his artful use of quotations to capture Lincoln's voice . and . his ability to convey a profound message in a handful of words." By contrast, he gives an example of Wikipedia's prose that he finds "both verbose and dull". Rosenzweig also criticized the "waffling—encouraged by the NPOV policy—[which] means that it is hard to discern any overall interpretive stance in Wikipedia history". While generally praising the article on William Clarke Quantrill, he quoted its conclusion as an example of such "waffling", which then stated: "Some historians . remember him as an opportunistic, bloodthirsty outlaw, while others continue to view him as a daring soldier and local folk hero."[202]

Other critics have made similar charges that, even if Wikipedia articles are factually accurate, they are often written in a poor, almost unreadable style. Frequent Wikipedia critic Andrew Orlowski commented, "Even when a Wikipedia entry is 100 percent factually correct, and those facts have been carefully chosen, it all too often reads as if it has been translated from one language to another then into a third, passing an illiterate translator at each stage."[203] A study of Wikipedia articles on cancer was conducted in 2010 by Yaacov Lawrence of the Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University. The study was limited to those articles that could be found in the Physician Data Query and excluded those written at the "start" class or "stub" class level. Lawrence found the articles accurate but not very readable, and thought that "Wikipedia's lack of readability (to non-college readers) may reflect its varied origins and haphazard editing".[204]The Economist argued that better-written articles tend to be more reliable: "inelegant or ranting prose usually reflects muddled thoughts and incomplete information".[205]

Coverage of topics and systemic bias

See also: Notability in the English Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia § Systemic bias in coverage

Ambox current red Americas.svg

Parts of this article (those related to d:Wikidata:Statistics/Wikipedia) need to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2017)

Wikipedia seeks to create a summary of all human knowledge in the form of an online encyclopedia, with each topic covered encyclopedically in one article. Since it has terabytes of disk space, it can have far more topics than can be covered by any printed encyclopedia.[206] The exact degree and manner of coverage on Wikipedia is under constant review by its editors, and disagreements are not uncommon (see deletionism and inclusionism).[207][208] Wikipedia contains materials that some people may find objectionable, offensive, or pornographic. The "Wikipedia is not censored" policy has sometimes proved controversial: in 2008, Wikipedia rejected an online petition against the inclusion of images of Muhammad in the English edition of its Muhammad article, citing this policy. The presence of politically, religiously, and pornographically sensitive materials in Wikipedia has led to the censorship of Wikipedia by national authorities in China[209] and Pakistan,[210] amongst other countries.

A 2008 study conducted by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and Palo Alto Research Center gave a distribution of topics as well as growth (from July 2006 to January 2008) windows 8.1 crack download (keygen + activator) - Activators Patch each field:[211]

  • Culture and Arts: 30% (210%)
  • Biographies and persons: 15% (97%)
  • Geography and places: 14% (52%)
  • Society and social sciences: 12% (83%)
  • History and events: 11% (143%)
  • Natural and Physical Sciences: 9% (213%)
  • Technology and Applied Science: 4% (−6%)
  • Religions and belief systems: 2% (38%)
  • Health: 2% (42%)
  • Mathematics and logic: 1% (146%)
  • Thought and Philosophy: 1% (160%)

These numbers refer only to the number of articles: it is possible for one topic to contain a large number of short articles and another to contain a small number of large ones. Through its "Wikipedia Loves Libraries" program, Wikipedia has partnered with major public libraries such as the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts to expand its coverage of underrepresented subjects and articles.[212]

A 2011 study conducted by researchers at the University of Minnesota indicated that disk drill 2.0 0.339 activation code free - Crack Key For U and female editors focus on different coverage topics. There was a greater concentration of females in the "people and arts" category, while males focus more on "geography and science".[213]

Coverage of topics and selection bias

Research conducted by Mark Graham of the Oxford Internet Institute in 2009 indicated that the geographic distribution of article topics is highly uneven. Africa is the most underrepresented.[214] Across 30 language editions of Wikipedia, historical articles and sections are generally Eurocentric and focused on recent events.[215]

An editorial in The Guardian in 2014 claimed that more effort went into providing references for a list of female porn actors than a list of women writers.[216] Data has also shown that Africa-related material often faces omission; a knowledge gap that a July 2018 Wikimedia conference in Cape Town sought to address.[136]

Systemic biases

When multiple editors contribute to one topic or set of topics, systemic bias may arise, due to the demographic backgrounds of the editors. In 2011, Wales claimed that the unevenness of coverage is a reflection of the demography of the editors, citing for example "biographies of famous women through history and issues surrounding early childcare".[48] The October 22, 2013, essay by Tom Simonite in MIT's Technology Review titled "The Decline of Wikipedia" discussed the effect of systemic bias and policy creep on the downward trend in the number of editors.[49]

Systemic bias on Wikipedia may follow that of culture generally,[vague] for example favoring certain nationalities, ethnicities or majority religions.[217] It may more specifically follow the biases of Internet culture, inclining to be young, male, English-speaking, educated, technologically aware, and wealthy enough to spare time for editing. Biases, intrinsically, may include an overemphasis on topics such as pop culture, technology, and current events.[217]

Taha Yasseri of the University of Oxford, in 2013, studied the statistical trends of systemic bias at Wikipedia introduced by editing conflicts and their resolution.[218][219] His research examined the counterproductive work behavior of edit warring. Yasseri contended that simple reverts or "undo" operations were not the most significant measure of counterproductive behavior at Wikipedia and relied instead on the statistical measurement of detecting "reverting/reverted pairs" or "mutually reverting edit pairs". Such a "mutually reverting edit pair" is defined where one editor reverts the edit of another editor who then, in sequence, returns to revert the first editor in the "mutually reverting edit pairs". The results were tabulated for several language versions of Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia's three largest conflict rates belonged to the articles George W. Bush, anarchism, and Muhammad.[219] By comparison, for the German Wikipedia, the three largest conflict rates at the time of the Oxford study were for the articles covering Croatia, Scientology, and 9/11 conspiracy theories.[219]

Researchers from Washington University developed a statistical model to measure systematic bias in the behavior of Wikipedia's users regarding controversial topics. The authors focused on behavioral changes of the encyclopedia's administrators after assuming the post, writing that systematic bias occurred after the fact.[220][221]

Explicit content

See also: Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia and Reporting of child pornography images on Wikimedia Commons

"Wikipedia censorship" redirects here. For the government censorship of Wikipedia, see Censorship of Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's policy concerning censorship, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not censored

Wikipedia has been criticized for allowing information about graphic content. Articles depicting what some critics have called objectionable content (such as feces, cadaver, human penis, vulva, and nudity) contain graphic pictures and detailed information easily available to anyone with access to the internet, including children.

The site also includes sexual content such as images and videos of masturbation and ejaculation, illustrations of zoophilia, and photos from hardcore pornographic films in its articles. It also has non-sexual photographs of nude children.

The Wikipedia article about Virgin Killer—a 1976 album from the GermanrockbandScorpions—features a picture of the album's original cover, which depicts a naked prepubescent girl. The original release cover caused controversy and was replaced in some countries. In December 2008, access to the Wikipedia article Virgin Killer was blocked for four days by most Internet service providers in the United Kingdom after the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) decided the album cover was a potentially illegal indecent image and added the article's URL to a "blacklist" it supplies to British internet service providers.[222]

In April 2010, Sanger wrote a letter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, outlining his concerns that two categories of images on Wikimedia Commons contained child pornography, and were in violation of US federal obscenity law.[223][224] Sanger later clarified that the images, which were related to pedophilia and one about lolicon, were not of real children, but said that they constituted "obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children", under the PROTECT Act of 2003.[225] That law bans photographic child pornography and cartoon images and drawings of children that are obscene under American law.[225] Sanger also expressed concerns about access to the images on Wikipedia in schools.[226]Wikimedia Foundation spokesman Jay Walsh strongly rejected Sanger's accusation,[227] saying that Wikipedia did not have "material we would deem to be illegal. If we did, we would remove it."[227] Following the complaint by Sanger, OBD Auto Doctor 3.8.2 Crack With License Key Torrent Free deleted sexual images without consulting the community. After some editors who volunteer to maintain the site argued that the decision to delete had been made hastily, Wales voluntarily gave up some of the powers he had held up to that time as part of his co-founder status. He wrote in a message to the Wikimedia Foundation mailing-list that this action was "in the interest of encouraging this discussion to be about real philosophical/content issues, rather than be about me and how quickly I acted".[228] Critics, including Wikipediocracy, noticed that many of the pornographic images deleted from Wikipedia since 2010 have reappeared.[229]

Privacy

One privacy concern in the case of Wikipedia is the right of a private citizen to remain a "private citizen" rather than a "public figure" in the eyes of the law.[230][note 6] It norton security deluxe crack - Free Activators a battle between the right to be anonymous in cyberspace and the right to be anonymous in real life ("meatspace"). A particular problem occurs in the case of a relatively unimportant individual and for whom there exists a Wikipedia page against her or his wishes.

In January 2006, a German court ordered the German Wikipedia shut down within Germany because it stated the full name of Boris Floricic, aka "Tron", a deceased hacker. On February 9, 2006, the injunction against Wikimedia Deutschland was overturned, with the court rejecting the notion that Tron's right to privacy or that of his parents was being violated.[231]

Wikipedia has a "Volunteer Response Team" that uses Znuny, a free and open-source software fork of OTRS[232] to handle queries without having to reveal the identities of the involved parties. This is used, for example, in confirming the permission for using individual images and other media in the project.[233]

Sexism

Main article: Gender bias on Wikipedia

Wikipedia was described in 2015 as harboring a battleground culture of sexism and harassment.[234][235]

The perceived toxic attitudes and tolerance of violent and abusive language were reasons put forth in 2013 for the gender gap in Wikipedia editorship.[236]

Edit-a-thons have been held to encourage female editors and increase the coverage of women's topics.[237]

A comprehensive 2008 survey, published in 2016, found significant gender differences in: confidence in expertise, discomfort with editing, and response to critical feedback. "Women reported less confidence in their expertise, expressed greater discomfort with editing (which typically involves conflict), and reported more negative responses to critical feedback compared to men."[238]

Operation

Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia movement affiliates

Main article: Wikimedia Foundation

Wikipedia is hosted and funded by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization which also operates Wikipedia-related projects such as Wiktionary and Wikibooks. The foundation relies on public contributions and grants to fund its mission.[239] The foundation's 2013 IRS Form 990 shows revenue of $39.7 million and expenses of almost $29 million, with assets of $37.2 million and liabilities of about $2.3 million.[240]

In May 2014, Wikimedia Foundation named Lila Tretikov as its second executive director, taking over for Sue Gardner.[241] The Wall Street Journal reported on May 1, 2014, that Tretikov's information technology background from her years at University of California offers Wikipedia an opportunity to develop in more concentrated directions guided by her often repeated position statement that, "Information, like air, wants to be free."[242][243] The same Wall Street Journal article reported these directions of development according to an interview with spokesman Jay Walsh of Wikimedia, who "said Tretikov would address that issue (paid advocacy) as a priority. 'We are really pushing toward more transparency . We are reinforcing that paid advocacy is not welcome.' Initiatives to involve greater diversity of contributors, better mobile support of Wikipedia, new geo-location tools to find local content more easily, and more tools for users in the second and third world are also priorities," Walsh said.[242]

Following the departure of Tretikov from Wikipedia due to issues concerning the use of the "superprotection" feature which some language versions of Wikipedia have adopted, Katherine Maher became the third executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation in June 2016.[244] Maher has stated that one of her priorities would be the issue of editor harassment endemic to Wikipedia as identified by the Wikipedia board in December. Maher stated regarding the harassment issue that: "It establishes a sense within the community that this is a priority . (and that correction requires that) it has to be more than words."[245]

Wikipedia is also supported by many organizations and groups that are affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation but independently-run, called Wikimedia movement affiliates. These include Wikimedia chapters (which are national or sub-national organizations, such as Wikimedia Deutschland and Wikimédia France), thematic organizations (such as Amical Wikimedia for the Catalan language community), and user groups. These affiliates participate in the promotion, development, and funding of Wikipedia.

Software operations and support

See also: MediaWiki

The operation of Wikipedia depends on MediaWiki, a custom-made, free and open sourcewiki software platform written in PHP and built upon the MySQL database system.[246] The software incorporates programming features such as a macro language, variables, a transclusion system for templates, and URL redirection. MediaWiki is licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL) and it is used by all Wikimedia projects, as well as many other wiki projects. Originally, Wikipedia ran on UseModWiki written in Perl by Clifford Adams (Phase I), which initially required CamelCase for article hyperlinks; the present double bracket style was incorporated later. Starting in January 2002 (Phase II), Wikipedia began running on a PHP wiki engine with a MySQL database; this software was custom-made for Wikipedia by Magnus Manske. The Phase II software was repeatedly modified to accommodate the exponentially increasing demand. In July 2002 (Phase III), Wikipedia shifted to the third-generation software, MediaWiki, originally written by Lee Daniel Crocker.

Several MediaWiki extensions are installed[247] to extend the functionality of the MediaWiki software.

In April 2005, a Lucene extension[248][249] was added to MediaWiki's built-in search and Wikipedia switched from MySQL to Lucene for searching. Lucene was later replaced by CirrusSearch which is based on Elasticsearch.[250]

In July 2013, after extensive beta testing, a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) extension, VisualEditor, was opened to public use.[251][252][253][254] It was met with much rejection and criticism, and was described as "slow and buggy".[255] The feature was changed from opt-out to opt-in afterward.

Automated editing

Main article: Wikipedia bots

Computer programs called bots have often been used to perform simple and repetitive tasks, such as correcting common misspellings and stylistic issues, or to start articles such as geography entries in a standard format from statistical data.[256][257][258] One controversial contributor, Sverker Johansson, creating articles with his bot was reported to create up to 10,000 articles on the Swedish Wikipedia on certain days.[259] Additionally, there are bots designed to automatically notify editors when they make common editing errors (such as unmatched quotes or unmatched parentheses).[260] Edits falsely identified by bots as the work of a banned editor can be restored by other editors. An anti-vandal bot is programmed to detect and revert vandalism quickly.[257] Bots are able to indicate edits from particular accounts or IP address ranges, as occurred at the time of the shooting down of the MH17 jet incident in July 2014 when it was reported that edits were made via IPs controlled by the Russian government.[261] Bots on Wikipedia must be approved before activation.[262]

According to Andrew Lih, the current expansion of Wikipedia to millions of articles would be difficult to envision without the use of such bots.[263]

Hardware operations and support

See also: Wikimedia Foundation § Hardware

Wikipedia receives between 25,000 and 60,000-page requests per second, depending on the time of the day.[264][needs update] As of 2021,

Источник: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia



Report!

I like MakeMKV it's ideal for occasional DVD to MKV without re-encoding .but.find it frustrating
it says the version is good for 60 days but the key never last more that a few weeks !!
so, need to un-install, download . my workaround is to stockpile and wait

as you can see it's released 1st Nov . the key expires.end of November.so much for 60 days 🤔

MakeMKV 1.16.5 Beta (November 1, 2021)

T-TwE7WcJc3CdIsCfVWztmTjeXqLsgGE8MApbZpXqf5ofCoKTw8qIcSBb71vQzrkZ0fW
(key valid until the end of November 2021)

Review by Davvid on Nov 5, 2021 Version: 1.16.5 Beta OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 9/10 Functionality: 8/10 Value for money: 6/10 Overall: 7/10





Report!

Don't get me wrong I think this software is worthy, but how do you get it to work in XP when it purports to be-this is bs? I'm using Win10, but do prefer the legacy system for encoding. Try open a dvd folder on your XP hard drive and MakeMKV GUI is just blanked out. What am I'm doing wrong? Guess I'll have to start using that awful system 10 more often!

Review by Pete on Nov 2, 2021 Version: 1.16.5 OS: WinXP Ease of use: 1/10 Functionality: 1/10 Value for money: 1/10 Overall: 1/10





Report!

Freezing and not working in Win7. Because of this I tried using it on XP system which apparently is still compatible and could only read DVD disc from hard drive. All other functions in GUI grayed out or unavailable. Strange! I've reverted back to previous beta which by the way doesn't work in XP as well, but fine in my Win7. Review/low score is for this beta only and not true reflection overall.

Review by Rod on Jul 17, 2021 Version: 1.16.4 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 1/10 Functionality: 1/10 Value for money: 1/10 Overall: 1/10





Report!

Congratulations to the developers, and I hope there will be more evolutions of this program.

Review by Diego Carvalho de Souza on Jul 10, 2021 Version: 1.16.3 OS: Windows 8 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 8/10 Overall: 9/10





Report!

There are a few bugs. The developer sometimes posts here in this section. Hopefully he looks at below reviews and eradicates the bugs. I like this software. I use Win8, and sometimes XP(MakeMKV has some troubles with this system!)but Win10 loves it as I've encountered no issues there

Review by Jacques on May 9, 2021 Version: 1.16.3 OS: Windows 8 64-bit Ease of use: 9/10 Functionality: 9/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 8/10





Report!

Used AnyDVD to decrypt an old concert DVD from 2003 that was copy protected. AnyDVD removed the copy protection, so you could see all the files in windows. Ran MakeMKV. MakeMKV correctly detected all the files. I started to copy the files to HD. It appeared to be working. Said it would take 25 mins for 6GB of files. After 15 mins, it showed it would now take 2+33 mins to copy the files. The length of time keep going up the longer it ran. It kept giving me some sort of invalid data error and said it was trying to work around. I finally closed the program after 30 mins. My pc is an I7, WIN 10 with 24GB of ram. Disappointed. Will try another program.

Review by skirk on May 8, 2021 Version: 1.16.3 Beta OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 8/10 Functionality: 2/10 Value for money: 8/10 Overall: 2/10





Report!

The answer to XP is it working? No it isn't! The GUI bug is still unfixed depending on your platform. That said you can transcoded a DVD using XP straight from your DVD ROM drive, but that's about it. Try doing it from a pre ripped folder on your hard drive. You won't be able to use MakeMKV GUI. Nothing to do with whether you have JavaScript installed or not, it just does not work in XP.

MakeMKV works in other platforms well which is okay but shouldn't advertizse in its info that it works in Legacy XP as it is crippled in this platform. I use Win8 and still use XP too as many do.

Review by Kevin on Apr 27, 2021 Version: 1.16.3 OS: Windows 8 64-bit Ease of use: 9/10 Functionality: 8/10 Value for money: 7/10 Overall: 7/10





Report!

It works fine on Win10 without a hitch, but is it working in XP now? I ask because when I last visited my brother he said he still uses xp for some video work and said there were major options on MakeMKV not working in the last version when navigating the GUI as others have said. I'll email him anyway to tell of update. Thanks.

Review by Carlo on Mar 18, 2021 Version: 1.16.2 OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 9/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 9/10





Report!

Rating by teamsatan on Mar 17, 2021 Version: 1.16.2 Beta OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 AOMEI OneKey Recovery Pro Crack Overall: 10/10





Report!

I'm rating this for XP only. None of the functions apart from dvd rom drive option works. Hope someone from MakeMKV forum sees this and passes on info to fix the bug. The software program is crippled at the moment for use in XP. Thanks.

Review by TD on Mar 8, 2021 Version: 1.16.1 OS: WinXP Ease of use: 5/10 Functionality: 5/10 Value for money: 1/10 Overall: 5/10





Report!

Half marks from me. Only works to make a MKV from DVD's in a DVDROM drive in Xp. Other advanced features or options in GUI grayed out or not available such as trying to locate a pre ripped DVD folder on the harddrive. I haven't tested it in other Windows platforms. Maybe just a Legacy issue?

Review by Dave P on Mar 7, 2021 Version: 1.61.1 OS: WinXP Ease of use: 5/10 Functionality: 5/10 Value for money: 5/10 Overall: 5/10





Report!

Right, tested on XP. It opens okay, but navigation problems using GUI in XP, Win7/8 tested! Failure to locate pre ripped folders or files on computer. GUI not reading My Computer or its related folders/sub folders! Advanced options/manual DVD opening etc not working too.

Also whenever a box is thrown up by program eg using DVD ROM option the box notification is blank message, and just red box!

Review by N.D on Mar 5, 2021 Version: 1.61.1 OS: Windows 8 64-bit Ease of use: 1/10 Functionality: 1/10 Value for money: 1/10 Overall: 1/10





Report!

I can't rate this version positively. There is indeed a navigation problem as mentioned. None of the functions to open a DVD manually or open an existing pre ripped dvd file/folder on PC hardrive is working. Only direct function from DVD rom is working. I tested on Win10 64 bit and same bug. GUI bug or something else causing navigation screw ups!

Review by K.Dent on Mar 5, 2021 Version: 1.16.1 Adobe Premiere Pro CC Patch OS: Windows 8 64-bit Ease of use: 1/10 Functionality: 1/10 Value for money: 1/10 Overall: 1/10





Report!

First off new version fixes bug in XP which forced program not to open. MakeMKV works pretty flawlessly in other systems of Windows, but in XP 'Houston we may have a newer bug?' 1.16.1 beta works for discs off the dvd rom drive, but opening an already ripped file folder MakeMKV fails to 'see' it in its gui.

Going to Open Files or Control + O then 'Look in' fails a powerful tool - Free Activators show anything at all. My Computer on left of gui is just a faded out grey. This prgram in XP only appears to work on dvd's in the rom drive as half of its functionality has gone for some reason? 10/10 for other systems but in XP 5/10. New beta to fix this weird problem of navigation to already ripped decrypted dvd folders on computer? thanks.

Review by Bob on Mar 5, 2021 Version: 1.16.1 OS: WinXP Ease of use: 9/10 Functionality: 7/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 6/10





Report!

I think the confusion lay in that for a brief time the older version was briefly still available on the MakeMkv website, yet the changelog here on Videohelp quickly(Baldrick moves fast with the latest versions-kudos to him!) showed 1.16.1 as the the newer version came out that the same day within hours or so of older version, depending on your time zone, muddling things a bit. I assumed still buggy, but the version must have 1.16. I uninstalled and deleted it so can't check version number.

I'm going to test it out on XP later- should work fine touch wood. Thanks.

Review by N.D on Mar 5, 2021 Version: 1.61.1 newest OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

@N.D
Did you try 1.16.1?
An XP bug has now been fixed ("Windows XP: Program failed to start").
I tried & it works fine on Windows XP.

Review by mike20021969 on Mar 4, 2021 Version: 1.16.1 OS: WinXP Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

My review is for XP as my interest was piqued and I wanted to test if it works or not in this system, otherwise regarding my Win10 the review would be 10/10 as previous version showed. I downloaded an installer off the MakeMKV web page and installed it, but a small red box appears(warning?) and program refuses to open. No good in XP! Why then does site say it is compatible with it? No worries back to Win 7 or Win10.

Review by N.D on Mar 4, 2021 Version: 1.61.1 OS: WinXP Ease of use: 1/10 Functionality: 1/10 Value for money: 1/10 Overall: 1/10





Report!

Works excellently well in Win7 to Win10- I will attest to that. MakeMKV site says works in XP and I still like to use that system for encoding etc now and again. Unfortunately for me it did not. Strangely that it failed to install. I saw error message of 'not a valid 32 bit program.' message.

Review by Derek on Mar 4, 2021 Version: 1.16.0 beta OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

I've used it for years (on Win 7 x64), prior to purchasing a license. It has worked pretty reliably for me for the most part, with occasional issues on certain rigs. This is probably not in the class of a cut & dry, "one-size-fits-all", "set it and forget it" software; there can be some wrinkles, if you are not diligent about looking into them. Yes, your particular hardware could be a factor. The MakeMKV forum is a good place for exploring that, and possibly also here on VH. The issues are more likely associated with Blu-Ray. For full functionality, you should have recent Java installed, and appropriately pointed to for MakeMKV to find it. There will be some BR discs that give it problems. I recently learned why desired subs from BR were not being rendered (thanks to the aforementioned forum), and this will involve the nuisance extra step of using some additional software.

When critiquing this program, we need to get real: there ain't anything much left on the market that does what this program does. Most of the "alternatives" listed here are long defunct. (Can't comment on BDtoAVCHD *yet*, as I haven't tried to use it, so far.) The only 3 programs I'm aware of that can handle the protections of commercial discs are: the Red Fox takeover of AnyDVD, and reviews of that company and its business practices here are troubling, to say the least; Fab, which is pricey even with discounts, has a totally different operational approach, and about which company somewhat ditto to the situation with Red Fox; and MakeMKV, which has been offered at no charge to us for quite a few years. I'd go so far as to make the argument that MakeMKV is nearly indispensable, we should be very glad to have it, and we should support it.

Review by Seeker47 on Sparkol Videoscribe Pro 3.7.3103 Crack 2021 Activation Code Free Mar 2, 2021 Version: 1.15.4 OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 9/10 Hide.me VPN 1.4.0 Crack Latest Version Full Free Download Functionality: 9/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 9/10





Report!

Comments about crashing reflect on the particular users system. I've been using this program for years and never a crash or hiccup. It works every time for me. That's why I bought a license several years ago.

Review by netmask56 on Feb 28, 2021 Version: 1.15.4 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Same here, no crashes and works like a charm. I must also add that I am a longterm user. The Software is here NOT to blame, somebody else ;)

Review by flashandpan007 on make mkv price - Free Activators Feb 28, 2021 Version: 1.16.0 Beta OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

I have used MakeMKV for years. Always works 100% of the time, no crashes etc. maybe some peps need to get a better computer system or know what to install or what NOT to install on their systems that interferes with software, before blaming this software.

Review by PcDirect on Feb 28, 2021 Version: MakeMKV 1.16.0 OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Remo Recover 6.1 Crack With Keygen Full 2022 Latest (Win/Mac) Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

I agree with the previous reviewer. This is very finicky software. When I used during its XP compatible days back then it always used to crash and now in Win7 or Win10 it still does. I even resorted to a portable version and that was crap too. It has never worked for me sad to say.

Review by Tim on Feb 28, 2021 Version: 1.16.0 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 1/10 Functionality: 1/10 Value for money: 1/10 make mkv price - Free Activators Overall: 1/10





Report!

I've been using MakeMKV and its great for doing backups - but as far Blu-Ray disks are concerned, its way to finicky. If you look at the forums you's see it often fails when trying to actually make MKV files with varying error messages. I had a bran new disk that plays and backs up fine, but I had to use BDtoAVCHD if I simply wanted to remux the video and audio, untouched, from the backup to an MKV file. I rated BDtoAVCHD a 10 because it gave me no problems.

Review by mugz8391 on Aug 28, 2020 Version: 1.15.2 OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 9/10 Functionality: 5/10 Value for money: 5/10 Overall: 7/10





Report!

Rating by The Don on airflow vs jenkins - Crack Key For U Jun 25, 2020 Version: 1.15.1 OS: Windows 7 Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Love this program!I did a bunch of dvd rips a couple of months ago, quality stuff! One click and you're done! I did a bunch of dvd conversions to mkv today which work.

Review by stargatesuite on Jun 4, 2020 Version: makemkv 1.15.1 beta OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 wondershare filmora crack key - Free Activators Overall: 10/10





Report!

Problem solved!
It was my antivirus program blocked the update.
Works fine now.

Thanks!

Review by deeyeej on Apr 20, 2020 Version: MakeMKV 1.15.1 Beta OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

@WiFi: I agree. The icing on the cake is if the command line version had an option to remove cinavia.

Review by GrampaD on Apr 13, 2020 Version: 1.15.0 registered OS: MacOSX Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

I've used this without any problems or errors for a few years now. Transferred all my DVD's and BR discs to MKV. I purchased a license to both support the author and eliminate the hassle of having to update the key every few months also if the powers that be decided to close the program down. I suspect the very few people who have had errors should look to their own computer for problems. I've used this on numerous PC's. Simply works

Review by netmask56 on Feb 19, 2020 Version: MakeMKV 1.14.7 Beta OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 9/10 Functionality: 9/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Believe me, I'd like to rate this much more highly, because **when it is working** it is simply great at what it does. The problem is that I've found it to be much too unreliable on my computers. I keep getting "Fatal Error", and then the program closes. (Have to call that a crash, folks !) I'll uninstall MakeMKV, reinstall it (still with the current version), then it may work for a short while, _or it may not_. Either way, the same problem is sure to return. I processed 4 or 5 BR titles over the last couple weeks with no problem using MakeMKV, but this morning we are right back to "Fatal Error." This even happens with no disc loaded. It's VERY frustrating. There was no sign of this behavior a week ago. My system in question has not changed at all, over the intervening time. It won't be a hardware problem either, because DVD Fab keeps chugging right along, doing its thing as expected, on the very same BR discs. Unfortunately for me, I much prefer working with the MKV format output by MakeMKV, as opposed to the BR file structures output by Fab. (Perhaps there are some alternate output formats one could select for Fab, other than ISO ? I gained a more than adequate familiarity with the DVD file structures, but never really did that for BR.) Not entirely sure about this, but I think the MKV format also kills Cinavia stone cold dead.

Are these "fatal errors" triggered by some latest new wrinkle in the copy protections that MakeMKV just cannot cope with ? Even so, that wouldn't explain the crashes with no disc loaded -- which definitely does NOT happen when the program is actually working. I've sought help on their forum, but still no explanation for all this, and no joy.

Anyway, I'd be happy to buy a license for MakeMKV, but I'd like this problem to receive a real and lasting fix. Otherwise, this program is a potential solution that I just can't count on.

Review by Seeker47 on Feb 19, 2020 Version: 1.14.7 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 8/10 Functionality: 7/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 5/10





Report!

Rating by rallen on Jan 25, 2020 Version: 1.14.7 OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

This software is unbelievable. With programs like DVDFab charging hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars for decrypting and copying your discs to harddrive at a Spectrasonics Keyscape 1.3.3c Crack Windows and Mac Full Free Download 2021 lossless conversion, MakeMKV is an absolute steal and is quite possibly one of the greatest programs ever created for the PC. It's not an exaggeration, MakeMKV is without a doubt the most critical tool any possible self-proclaimed cinephile could own. Add on top of that the fact that the developer is constantly giving away free beta keys to extend the freeware period by 60 days AND the fact that he and his community are active 24/7 on the forums makes MakeMKV to the DVD/BDR scene what Doom9 was to us almost 20 years ago.

MakeMKV is also an import and incredible tool because of its easy, completely intuitive interface. It's got a great minimalist aesthetic and everything is simple, concise and effortless to figure out and navigate. So easy, in fact, that an elementary school child could figure out how to rip a dvd/bluray to a harddrive if given the opportunity.

MakeMKV can't be praised enough. The 9.0 score from ~70 users is deserved, 100%. I'm amazed it doesn't have a perfect 10/10. After years of use, I plan to use it for as long as I have a bluray and dvd library to backup and update on my NAS. Bravo to the MakeMKV family and thank you for everything you've done for the scene. Much love and respect!!!

Review by WiFi on Dec 1, 2019 Version: 1.14.5 OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Makemkv was the best program they ever invented when it comes to creating an MKV video file from physical media, without changing its video, audio or subtitle structure. In the generation of Smart tv, it is a rather than exciting tool, because for me that has a large collection of dvd's and no longer uses the dvd player, I can simply create a file in mkv, and transfer it for my external hd, or flash drive (depending on the file size of course), it is possible to create the same process in other ways, but it is too complicated, and requires more tools, make mkv, automates and facilitates this process and safer anyway, Makemkv is an indispensable tool, and one that makes you easier to insert into the new way of watching video on television without discarding your physical media, rather than saving your content, in a single file, Congratulations to the developers!

Review by Diego Souza on Sep 27, 2019 Version: 1.14.4 OS: Windows 10 Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 7/10 Overall: 9/10





Report!

Rating by Forrest Gump on Aug 21, 2019 Version: 1.14.4 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Excellent software. I noticed in other reviews that the latest product key is issued for free by the developer on their official Forum (in a thread under the Announcements section).

It works perfectly for doing straight forward Blu-ray backups. I've just used it with 2 Blu-ray discs which aren't encrypted, and I'm now left with 2 .MKV files, fully chapter'd, without transcoding(!) and it plays perfectly in MPC-HC. I used an exclamation mark for the no-transcode design because it means I have a 1:1 flawless quality reproduction, and it drastically reduces conversion time too. Obviously the resulting file size is 'massive' as a result but who doesn't have terabytes of space these days for files coming in at 10-20GB a piece.

It's honestly amazing how such a light-weight, simple but effective piece of software is created for free (at least for now) by the developer who has surely invested over a hundred hours into this. My hat's off to him.

Review by James on Aug 2, 2019 Version: 1.14.4 Beta OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

I ended up buying the program as it "just works" I used Boom 3D Free Download free version updating the rego code as per instructions for years, finally thought maybe I should support the author and I bought a permanent license. Absolutely no problems with it and I have transferred all my Blu Ray and DVD's to MKV and loaded them onto my NAS. I reckon anyone who has a problem with getting it work hasn't read or more to the point comprehended the instructions.

Review by netmask56 on Mar 8, 2019 Version: 1.14.2 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 8/10 Functionality: 9/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

@Bob
MakeMKV is FREE* whilst in beta. And it's been in "beta" for years.
*Temporary keys are continuously provided by the developer on the forum when the current one expires.
As such, there is no need to purchase anything so technically MakeMKV is free.
If the program ever makes it out of "beta" (which is doubtful) the DVD capabilities will remain free of charge.

Review by mike20021969 on Feb 28, 2019 Version: 1.14.2β OS: WinXP Ease of use: 8/10 Functionality: 8/10 Value for money: 8/10 Overall: 9/10





Report!

So, how is this a FREEWARE if it costs $50? There's not way to install only DVD version (without Bluray functionality) because there isn't DVD-only version, as some people state here. Any comments on this convoluted word-game crap? ;-)))

Review by Bob on Feb 28, 2019 Version: 1.14.2 OS: Windows 10 Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 8/10 Value for money: 3/10 Overall: 7/10





Report!

Cube799 did you download the hashed keys and put them in makemkv dir i dont have any problems

Review by makemkvuser on Dec 10, 2018 Version: 1.14.2 OS: Windows 8 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

I've been using this for quite a while and liked it, Until I bought a 4k Blu-Ray drive!!! Went through all the trouble of downgrading it to see if MakeMKV would rip with it, But it Didn't! Though I had downgraded the Drive Wrong, but I Hadn't! I Tried to rip The 4K Disk with The trial Version of DVDFAB and it worked!! I don't understand why DvdFab works with my Drive, but Not MakeMKV?!

Review by Cube799 on Nov 25, 2018 Make mkv price - Free Activators 1.14.1 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 9/10 Functionality: 7/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 6/10





Report!

Rating only.

Review by HemLok on Nov 8, 2018 Version: 1.14.0 beta OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

IsoBuster Serial Keyrks. Start up IsoBuster, Insert a circle, select the drive (if not chosen as of now) and let IsoBuster mount the media. IsoBuster instantly demonstrates to all of you the tracks and sessions situated on the media, joined with all document frameworks that are available.
Along these lines, you get simple to access, much the same as Windows Explorer, to every one of the records and envelopes per document framework. Rather than being restricted to one document framework that the OS picks for you, you approach "the entire picture". Access information from more established sessions, get to information that your OS (e.g. Windows) does not see or avoids you and so on.

Review by mehfooz on Sep 29, 2018 Version: 1.12.3 OS: Windows 8 64-bit Ease of use: 5/10 Functionality: 7/10 Value for money: 5/10 Overall: 7/10





Report!

Rating by ZORRO on Aug 7, 2018 Version: 1708 OS: Windows 7 Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Rating by ZORRO on Aug 7, 2018 Version: 1708 OS: Windows 7 Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Rating by b on Aug 5, 2018 Version: 7 OS: Windows 8 Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Rating by a on Aug 5, 2018 Version: 1810 OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Rating by p on Aug 5, 2018 Version: 7 OS: Windows 7 Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

This is STILL free after nearly 10 years. There is no trial version vs full version, just the beta version still. Someday the software will move from beta to production but most probably NOT. I've owned this software after using it for 5 years with only very few issues, one issue with closed captions and a few DVDS won't copy correctly(about 1-2% of them). I felt I wanted to support MakeMKV for their great work so I bought it.

This is a great DVD/Blueray ripper. It will rip your dvd or blueray but don't confuse it with re-encoding. Used with Handbrake (also free) for re-encoding and you have everything you need. For the few DVDs that I've had issues with closed captions using Handbrake with the libdvdcss have worked fine.

Review by Dave m. on Jul 1, 2018 Version: 1.1.12 OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 9/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Rating by fronkenstoyn on Jun 14, 2018 Version: 1.12.2 Beta OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Rating by fronkenstoyn on Jun 14, 2018 Version: 1.12.2 Beta OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Rating by VidiMini on Mar 17, 2018 Version: 1.12.0 Beta OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 9/10 Functionality: 2/10 Value for money: 2/10 Overall: 2/10





Report!

Rating by papa on Jan 30, 2018 Version: 1.10.10 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Rating by opiWANken on Jan 25, 2018 Version: 1.10.09 OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Rating by jordoncomp on Nov 14, 2017 Version: 1.10.7 OS: Linux Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Rating by AdamCatalyst on Oct 6, 2017 Version: 1.10.7 OS: MacOSX Ease of use: 9/10 Functionality: 8/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 9/10





Report!

Great program!
I'm backing up my entire DVD and Blu-ray collection and giving it some hammer. It hasn't tripped up once in a 100+ discs so far.
I sometimes override its selection of subtitles and extras, but if you're not fussy, it's click 'n' go.

Review by AlanC on Sep 4, 2017 Version: MakeMKV 1.10.6 Beta OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Been using since 2009 with great results. Author always monitors forums and replys quickly. Best $50 I've spent software wise

Review by dannyboy48888 on Mar 26, 2017 Version: 1.10 OS: Linux Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

This is a great program, I bought the key a long time ago and haven't had any key problems. I have used it on Windows and various versions of Linux. It is the only thing I have found that will De-crypt and rip a Blu-Ray in Linux. It will rip the whole BD to your Hard drive also.

Review by n8tvm on Feb 17, 2017 Version: 1.10.4 OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 8/10 Functionality: 9/10 Value for money: 9/10 Overall: 9/10





Report!

I am curious why this is still in Beta after so long. Works ok once the author posts a key to use.

Review by ron spencer on easeus data recovery 11.8 license code - Crack Key For U Sep 11, 2016 Version: 1.10.2 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 8/10 Functionality: 9/10 Value for money: 5/10 Overall: 8/10





Report!

Great product when it works, but latest version is expired and there is no new key posted.

Review by V1de0Luvr on Jun 8, 2016 Version: 1.9.10 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 6/10





Report!

Great piece of software. I went ahead and bought a key a long time ago so I haven't had any of the Problems with key that have been poster here. It also works on Linux which I have a dual boot setup Windows/Linux Mint.

Review by n8tvm on Feb 24, 2016 Version: 1.9.9 OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 9/10 Value for money: 8/10 Overall: 9/10





Report!

Wonderful piece of software.

Review by iohanntachy on Oct 29, 2015 Version: 1.9.7 OS: Windows 10 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

@ RLT69: I was/am aware of that. That's why I posted link to the 'makemkv.com website down?' thread. I did clean install of MakeMKV v. 1.9.6 on new system and ripping of DVDs worked without any problems. I don't have a Blu-Ray drive, but one of the forum members confirmed he had problems with BDs. So maybe MakeMKV downloads some additional data needed to rip them? Anyway I have no clue what caused problems for some people, but not for me.

Anyway www.makemkv.com is back on, plus we can enjoy new 1.9.7 version of our favourite program :-)

Review by AllisOne on Oct 4, 2015 Version: 1.9.7 vuescan 9.6.24 crack - Crack Key For U OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 avast antivirus review - Crack Key For U Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

@AllisOn Obviously you are not aware that the latest version (1.9.6) is not working. When you run it it says it has expired. Hence why EVERYONE is asking for a new key. The current beta key which is suppose to be good through November DOES NOT WORK. In fact it's September's key. So a new key needs to be posted. If you bothered to check the forums you would see what has been going on.

To get the program to work you need an earlier version and need to set your system clock back a month or so.

Review by RLT69 on Oct 4, 2015 Version: 1.9.6 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

I've re-downloaded the newest 1.9.6 version and I'm not able to rip a blu-ray because it says the evaluation period is over even while saying the version expires on 12-23-15

Review by ronson10 on Oct 3, 2015 Version: 1.9.6 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

@ Spitfire63: as long as MakeMKV is in beta stage, you just download and install the newest version. The key is included. Only in rare occasions you need to look for it. The link to the newest is right in front of your eyes under 'Download MakeMKV 1.9.6 Beta (direct link)' - http://www.videohelp.com/download/Setup_MakeMKV_v1.9.6.exe .
Or here: http://www.download3k.com/Install-MakeMKV.html (and no, you don't need to pay 50$, 'cos it's still beta)

The program's website is down at the moment, but you can check this thread: http://forum.videohelp.com/threads/374502-makemkv-com-website-down

Review by AllisOne on Oct 3, 2015 Version: 1.6.6 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Does anyone have the key for the latest version 1.9.6. I was able to download the software from a mirror but the MakeMKV website is down and I can't retrieve the key.

Review by skids48 on Oct 3, 2015 Version: 1.9.6 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Where do I find the 1.9.6 MakeMKV beta key that expires in Dec?

Review by Spitfire63 on Oct 3, 2015 Version: 1.9.6 OS: Windows 8 64-bit Ease of use: 9/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Yes, the web site is down, which is concerning. I installed 1.9.6 yesterday and it does not expire until December 23rd. Hopefully the web site will come back before then.

Review by V1de0Luvr on Oct 3, 2015 Version: 1.9.6 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 9/10 gridinsoft anti-malware 4.0.38 crack - Free Activators Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

.wonderful piece of software to enable me to get home videos onto a tablet. It doesn't work now, though, as I cannot renew the key because makemkv.com is not available! The website is down!

Review by josephandrews222 on Oct 3, 2015 Version: 1.9.5 OS: Windows 7 Ease of use: 5/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 7/10





Report!

What a great tool. Please update for OSX 10.10 when possible. It would be great if there were an option for target file size encoding. Thanks for a great product, it never fails me, I just have to use HandBrake to compress larger titles. I would love to see this built into MakeMKV but we can't have it all I suppose.

Review by crjackson on Aug 19, 2014 Version: 1.8.9 OS: MacOSX Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 9/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 9/10





Report!

From MakeMKV forum:
As stated on a main page all features of MakeMKV are free while program is in beta. You may purchase the full activation key if you like the program and want to show your support, but you also may use the temporary beta key.

The current beta key is

T-5o_eC30IouHhhcMhc7zCTYBADWLqlYWayIs2ahFAuN8YCHEu5sqxf@mfQA96autdEw

and is valid until end of July 2014. Please check back for updated key on this page.

http://www.makemkv.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1053

Review by AllisOne on Jun 16, 2014 Version: 1.8.10 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 9/10 Functionality: 9/10 nessus crack linux - Free Activators Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Very impressive. I have been using AnyDVD for most rips but when I came across an Academy Screener which had numerous bogus movie files to thwart such rippage, MakeMKV made short work of it.

I am a new fan.

Review by spudbone on Jan 3, 2014 Version: beta OS: Linux Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Awesome tool for taking dvds and blurays and putting them into a workable container. Any problems i have had mike has been quick to respond to. Definatly worth the 50 dollars for life as it is the only linux solution that works consistantly

Review by dannyboy48888 on Sep 4, 2013 Version: 1.8.4 OS: Linux Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Here's a feature that should be mentioned. I had several MKV files that would not play with my stand alone BR player. I loaded them into MakeMKV and it made them compatible with my device. A a gig mkv file took less than a minute to clean up. Of course it does much more.

Review by danzeb on Sep 2, 2013 Version: 1.8.4 OS: WinXP Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

Excellent tool! Splits vob file sets into mkv episodes based on the .IFO file.

MakeMKV deserves some monetary love!

Review by flinkq on after effects 2019 crack - Crack Key For U Jul 24, 2013 Version: 1.8.4 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 9/10 Value for money: 10/10 Overall: 10/10





Report!

@kukkamies

Although the DVD part MakeMKV is always FREE.

Review by mike20021969 on Apr 23, 2013 Version: 1.8.1 OS: WinXP Ease of use: 8/10 Functionality: 8/10 Zentimo xStorage Manager 2.3.1.1281 Free Download with Crack Value for money: 8/10 Overall: 8/10





Report!

Pretty ok software to rip bluray to mkv. It NOT freeware though as site says. It is shareware and the software says that when using it. It only gives 30 days of "free use".

Definitely would use it longer if it were freeware (donation option, vink vink) but 50 euros is way too expensive for me considering there are free alternatives like bdtoavchd or mkvtoolnix that are able to do the same.

Review by kukkamies on Apr 23, 2013 Version: 1.8.1 OS: Windows 8 64-bit Ease of use: 7/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 5/10 Overall: 8/10





Report!

It Rips any kind of Blu-ray movies, like a new movie that just came out.

Review by 2F2E on Aug 1, 2012 Version: 1.76 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 10/10 Value for money: 10/10 crystalidea uninstall tool crack - Activators Patch Overall: 10/10





Report!

It does work but why pay $70 when there are freeware tools (ClownBD, Blu2mkv) that will rip a blu-ray to MKV? It's menu option is primitive too compared with the freeware alternatives.

The thing you're paying for is the BD decryption, but if you have a subscription to AnyDVD HD or its equivalent in the DVD Fab market then that will will decrypt NetLimiter Pro 4.1.11 Crack With Keygen Full PC Version [Free Download] 2021 you plus many other things too. MakeMKV just makes MKV's and thats that. It won't even compress for you.

Conclusion: too limited for the money. Avoid.

Review by Chug a Bug on May 2, 2012 Version: 1.7.4 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 5/10 Functionality: 9/10 Value for money: 2/10 Overall: 3/10





Report!

The easiest tool I have used so far. Drop the Blu-ray in the tray, select the right video track, audio track and subtitle and click on save.

The only draw back it has is that it does not compress the source video. Not sure if that is a draw back to some, but for me, I want to have quality and space. I cannot have 40 GB mkv files for every disk drill 2.0 0.339 activation code free - Crack Key For U title I buy. 5 to 10 GB is acceptable.

So once I have ripped the mkv, I use FreeMake Video converter to compress the file further. Since freeMake video converter does not run Glary Utilities Pro 5.153.0.179 Crack - Free Activators Linux, I have Windows-7 running under VirtualBox and since I have my folders auto-mounted to VirtualBox, I can kickoff the conversion from my Windows without delay.

I tried using Handbrake to compress the mkv, but it does not even come close to what FreeMake Video Converter can do.

Review by ggr on Mar 31, 2012 Version: 1.7.3 OS: Linux Ease of use: 10/10 Functionality: 9/10 Value for money: 9/10 Overall: 9/10





Report!

Is perfect for making non compressed MKVs from Bluray disc.

Great while its free. $70 to buy though, is just ludicrous.

Источник: https://www.videohelp.com/software/MakeMKV/reviews

How to extract the WAV tracks from Blu-ray or DVD-Audio discs?

I found two tools that can help with the job.

ACE-Encode is a FOSS script:

ACE-Encode was born from the need convert a whole CD/DVD/BluRay library (450+) into music & movie files readable on a Home Theater PC (HTPC).

ACE-Encode works by automatically ripping an inserted CD/DVD/BluRay to a folder

To enable automatic CD/DVD/BluRay ripping:

Step 4 takes into account that you have ABCDE, DVDBackup, MakeMKV & HandBrake installed and working correctly. For help installing any of the above, please see the INSTALLATION section for each extension.


Another tool is MakeMKV. It is not FOSS and reportedly costs $50. The Beta version is usually free, but this could change anytime.

For Ubuntu Linux users you can install MakeMKV from the ppa:heyarje/makemkv-beta PPA:

Usually all features of MakeMKV are free while the program is in beta. You may purchase the full activation key if you like the program and want to show your support, but you also may use the temporary beta key. Check the PPA page for the current beta key.

Источник: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/121431/how-to-extract-the-wav-tracks-from-blu-ray-or-dvd-audio-discs?rq=1

 

Reading Guide

  1. AnyDVD Mac OS Version?
  2. AnyDVD Mac Alternatives Available for Users
  3. FAQs

1. AnyDVD Mac OS Version?

 

Many are trying to find AnyDVD Mac version to match with their system, does there has one AnyDVD Mac software? Scroll down find out the answer together.

Created by SlySoft, AnyDVD is a windows-based software designed to help users easily remove protection from DVDs and Blu-rays, copy and rip their contents and save them to hard drive or computer in various formats. Since its launch, AnyDVD has been spoken highly by users almost everywhere for its functionality. If you ever wonder and search for whether Slysoft has an AnyDVD for Mac OS version, then you’d probably find out nothing.

slysoft anydvd alternative

Right, currently Slysoft doens’t have AnyDVD for Mac OS version, many are in search of great AnyDVD Mac alternatives to meet their needs. If you happen to be one of them, looking for Slysoft AnyDVD equivalent for Mac, then this article is right for you to read.

 

2. Best AnyDVD Mac Alternative Available for Users

 

Here we’ve compiled a top list for users to choose from, covering 10 Slysoft AnyDVD for Mac OS alternatives:

No. 1 DVDFab All-In-One for Mac

Price: Paid

dvdfab decrypt dvd protection

DVDFab All-In-One for Mac is a powerful AnyDVD HD alternative combining DVD/Blu-ray copier/ripper and video converter into one. With the ability to remove DVD/Blu-ray protections, this versatile package can copy and rip DVDs/Blu-rays to blank disc, hard drive or your computer in various files, and convert the video between various lossless formats, with an aim to deliver the users best experience. What’s most amazing is that this AnyDVD for Mac OS alternative DVDFab covers almost all protections, including Cinavia, which AnyDVD cannot remove.

Removable Protection: almost all DVD/Blu-ray protections, Cinavia included.

Features of DVDFab All-In-One for Mac
      • Copy, rip, create DVDs/Blu-rays
      • Copy, rip, UHDs
      • Remove DVD/Blu-ray/UHD Cinavia
      • Convert DVDs to standard Blu-ray format.
      • Convert Blu-rays to standard DVD format.
      • Extract Hi-Fi Audios from DVD/Blu-ray/UHD
      • Decrypt DVD/Blu-ray/UHD protections during the copying and ripping process

How-to Guide: Copy/Rip DVD with DVDFab All-In-One for Mac

Step 1: Launch DVDFab for Mac

Download and install DVDFab for Mac, double click to launch this AnyDVD HD alternative, then you would see a clear interface integrating DVD Copy, Ripper, Converter and Creator features.

Step 2: Go to Copy/Rip Feature

go to copy/rip feature

If you have a need to copy the DVD or Blu-ray on hand, choose Copy feature. Under Copy feature, there are several different modes for you to choose make mkv price - Free Activators Main Movie, Customize, Full Disc, Clone/Burn, Merge or Split.

dvdfab copy modes

Or, if you’d like to rip the disc to videos or other devices, go for Ripper feature. Under Ripper feature, you can choose the target video, audio formats or devices you would like to rip into at the profile library. Then, move to the next step.

dvdfab ripper feature

Step 3: Import DVD/Blu-ray into AnyDVD Mac Alternative

Click the + button in the center to load the DVD/Blu-ray source, or drag it into this AnyDVD for Mac OS alternative, during the process, DVDFab shall automatically detect the DVD or Blu-ray copy protections and remove it, then you are free to make advanced settings like choosing subtitles, bitrate, compressing BD to DVD, adding watermarks, etc.

Step 4: Start Conversion Process 

Once you’ve finished the advanced settings, don’t forget to select a directory, then just click Start button to kick off the copying or ripping process.

All right, that’s all about this top 1 AnyDVD equivalent for Mac. Check out more AnyDVD HD alternative for Mac in the following.

No. 2 MakeMKV

Price: Partially free

makemkv alternative to anydvd

MakeMKV, as a cross-platform and good AnyDVD Mac alternative, allows users to convert DVD and Blu-Ray into videos of MKV format, just like what its name says. Besides, users can use this AnyDVD alternative with other third-party software to burn the video converted to DVD or Blu-Ray disc. While one thing you should remember is that, unlike AnyDVD capable of making ISO and folder files, MakeMKV doesn’t support that, nor can it solve hardware issue like HDCP compliance or remove unskippable content. Lastly, this AnyDVD alternative is free for DVD discs, but charged for Blu-Rays after a 30-day trial period.

Removable Protection: only DVD protections, paid for Blu-ray ones.

No. 3 Aneesoft DVD Ripper Pro

Price: Paid

anneesoft anydvd alternative

As a DVD ripping tool to rip and convert DVD movies to videos, Aneesoft DVD Ripper Pro for Mac is a good alternative to AnyDVD for Mac OS, you could use this AnyDVD alternative to rip encrypted DVD movies and remove copy protection, and then convert the disc content to other video formats oriented for devices like iPad, iPod, iPhone, Apple TV, PSP, Motorola, BlackBerry, and more.

Removable Protection: DVD protections only.

No.4 DVDFab HD Decrypter

Price: Free

dvdfab hd decrypter anydvd alternative

Ranking No.4 is a free AnyDVD HD alternative software, DVDFab HD Decryptor. If you are looking for free alternatives to AnyDVD for Mac OS, then this program created by DVDFab is the one. One thing to bear in mind is that it is not just a protection decryption software, but also a simplified all-in-one program integrating DVD Copy, DVD Ripper, Blu-ray Copy, Blu-ray Ripper and Video Converter altogether, which means users could use it to copy, rip and convert the decrypted content to a blank disc, or save it as ISO, folder files or video of different formats. But, please remember you’d better use it to deal with DVD or Blu-rays released before 2018, and this AnyDVD equivalent for Mac doesn’t support H.265 and 4K videos.

Removable Protection: CSS, RC, RCE, APS, UOPs, Sony ARccOS, AACS, BD+, RC, UOPS and BD-Live, etc.

No. 5 DVDSmith Movie Backup

Price: Free

dvdsmith-anydvd alternative

DVDSmith Movie Backup, created by DVDSmith, works as a good AnyDVD alternative. This program can decrypt and remove DVD copy protections and help users to copy the entire DVD movie to hard drive. With DVDSmith Movie Backup, users could back up their favorite DVD movies in just a few clicks, either the full movie or main movie. Moreover, this AnyDVD HD alternative allows user to select audios and subtitles. With this powerful DVD copy software, you could save newly released DVDs like Sleeping Beauty, Iron Man, Parasite for enjoyment anywhere and anytime, a real bliss for home theater enthusiast.

Removable Protection: DVD copy protections like CSS, RC, RCE, APS, UOPs and Sony ARccOS.

3. FAQs About AnyDVD Mac Alernatives

All right, here comes to the last part for you, frequent asked questions. After you’ve read the above info about best AnyDVD HD alternatives, you might have some questions about which one to choose from, please refer to the following FAQs and decide.

FAQ 1:  Can I decrypt 4k UHD protection with above AnyDVD Mac Alternatives?

Yes. Among above recommended AnyDVD equivalent for Mac, DVDFab All-In-One for Mac is the only one that can decrypt 4k UHD copy protection and cover the most comprehensive DVD, Blu-ray as well as UHD copy protections, even including Cinavia. For more info, visit its official site to learn other features.

FAQ 2: If I Only Want to Decrypt Regular Copy Protections, How Should I Choose?

 

If your need is to simply decrypt regular DVD protections like RC code, UOPs, etc., you can choose a free AnyDVD HD alternative for Mac from above like MakeMKV, which is free for removing DVD protections, or DVDFab HD Decryptor, the free program created by DVDFab, which is also capable of copying, ripping and converting DVD/Blu-ray into videos free of charge.

 

Voila! That’s all about today’s article on best AnyDVD for Mac OS Alternatives, hope you’ve successfully backed up you favorite movies! Lastly, for Windows users who are trying to find a good alternative to AnyDVD HD, please read this article: Top Alternatives in 2020.

 


Read more about:
Источник: https://anydvd.cc/

Notice: Undefined variable: z_bot in /sites/healthplum.us/free-activators/make-mkv-price-free-activators.php on line 107

Notice: Undefined variable: z_empty in /sites/healthplum.us/free-activators/make-mkv-price-free-activators.php on line 107

1 Replies to “Make mkv price - Free Activators”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *