pirate spotify premium  - Free Activators

Free Minecraft Premium Accounts { How To Get Free Unlimited Minecraft Premium Accounts How to Get Spotify Premium for Free via Family Account. a Pay Monthly plan of $59 or more, you can get Spotify Premium FREE! to follow these steps in order to receive your activation text. 4 days ago Spotify Premium Crack 2020 + Activation Key Free Download Discover Weekly playlists; Music tracks can on the iOS lock screen and control.

Pirate spotify premium - Free Activators -

5 Myths About Spotify You Probably Believe... Busted

When was the last time you downloaded music from iTunes or Amazon? Do you load up a CD when you need some tunes on a long car trip?

Of course not. Instead, you almost certainly get your music through Spotify or another something similar. Since the rise of streaming music services (fronted by Spotify) in the early 2010s, paid downloads have declined greatly. Many people will tell you that Spotify is evil and is causing the death of the music industry, but those claims are overblown.

Let's discuss some of the biggest misconceptions about Spotify and reveal the truth.

Myth 1: Spotify Doesn't Pay Artists

If you've heard a single criticism against Spotify, it's probably this. Since the service became popular, critics have claimed that Spotify doesn't properly compensate artists for their content. While Spotify's base payment might sound low at first glance, it's important to review where that money actually goes.

Obviously but importantly, Spotify does pay artists. Just because the service is "free" to non-Premium subscribers doesn't mean that free users aren't paying in some way. Those who assume because you can just download Spotify and start listening to music that it's equivalent to piracy services like LimeWire haven't done their basic research. If you're a Premium subscriber, Spotify uses your monthly fee to pay out what it owes. Free users see ads instead, and those ads generate revenue that Spotify uses in lieu of payment.

Spotify used to feature a page on its site that detailed how it pays artists, but it's no longer up. The exact payments Spotify doles out hinge on a number of factors, but as best we know it averages between $0.006 and $0.0084 per stream. Compare this to Apple's iTunes, where most songs costs $1.29. Apple takes a 30 percent cut of all sales, meaning that at best, an artist would make about 90 cents on one song download. This makes less than one cent per stream sound like a destitute wage, but consider how people use streaming services.

Recounting My Personal Experience

My favorite band is The Classic Crime. I've listened to them since before I first became a Spotify user. Whenever they release a new album, I listen to it on Spotify because that's the central location where I get all my music from. For the foreseeable future, I'll continue to stream their music regularly, and I've already listened to every one of their albums dozens of times.

The Classic Crime has already made more money from me than if I'd simply bought each album once. Further, I've supported their newer albums on Kickstarter, which also provides them with income (by the way, Kickstarter also takes a cut of projects, and you don't see anyone complaining about how that hurts the music industry).

Simply put, a band's fans will financially support them the same through Spotify as they would through buying CDs or with iTunes downloads. If you wouldn't spend $10 to download a band's album, you're not going to give them too many Spotify listens, either.

This is all foregoing the fact that in most cases, record companies are the rights holders that Spotify pays out to. These go-betweens take some of the profits, too. Unfortunately, this is a reality of the music industry and is the same anywhere -- it's not Spotify's problem. The company has a contract to pay out a certain amount to whomever owns the rights to the song. If a band has a contract with a record label, then the label has a legal right to that money. Independent bands take more of the profits since they don't have to deal with the middle man.

For a detailed breakdown of why streaming royalties are complicated, see this Quora post.

Myth 2: Spotify Harms the Music Industry

We've confirmed that artists make money from Spotify, but what about the music industry at large? Taylor Swift claimed that Spotify is awful and pulled her music from the service, while The Beatles released their entire catalog to streaming services at the end of 2015. What do these two different approaches show about Spotify's effect on the industry?

Consider that Spotify has given people less of a reason to pirate music. In the early days of iTunes, your choices were to pay for a download or go the piracy route. Now, it only takes a few minutes to download Spotify, start an account, and listen to all the music you want. Even if people only casually listen to music on Spotify, that's a legitimate use that benefits both the artists and the industry. It's far healthier than the now-defunct Grooveshark, which many people used to illegally stream music for a decade.

It's important to remember that many other mediums are trending towards streaming instead of ownership. Netflix lets you stream movies and PlayStation Now can stream PS4 games to your PC. In both cases, you don't own the media that you're consuming. It's licensed for your use as long as you're a paying customer. Streaming hasn't killed either of those industries -- actually, they're adapting as the times change.

Additionally, Spotify gives smaller artists a better chance to break out than they'd have without it. Bands can link to their Spotify pages and playlists from anywhere -- sending them to friends is an easy way to get their music out there. Further, Spotify's regularly-updated playlists often feature up-and-coming artists. If a band gets their music selected for one of these mixes, they could see a great boost in popularity.

Myth 3: Spotify Has Totally Stopped Piracy

While Spotify has provided a wholesome alternative to stealing music, the problem isn't going away anytime soon. Many people are happy to pay for a streaming subscription or live with ads in their music, but others aren't for a couple of different reasons.

Although Spotify is good at bringing new releases to its catalog right away, sometimes users have to wait a while.

When Kanye West released his album The Life of Pablo, he restricted it to the problematic Tidal service, stating that he would never release it anywhere else. Pablo didn't come to Spotify for another 45 days after the album's initial release. This means that Spotify subscribers who wanted to hear the album had to either pay up for the additional subscription or listen to it via other means -- like piracy. That's how over 500,000 people first listened to the record.

Spotify doesn't have every music track known to man, so listeners who want to keep all their music in one place are likely to pirate the missing music and import it into Spotify manually. And it's an unfortunate fact that we'll always have people who pirate no matter what honest options are available. Whether they want to own music without paying for it or just don't give a damn about the artist making money, Spotify isn't going to tempt them away.

Similarly, while listening to music on YouTube isn't ideal, people have uploaded thousands of albums to YouTube for anyone to access. If the uploader doesn't hold the rights to the music, doing so is creating an illegal copy and breaking the law.

Myth 4: Listening to Spotify Is Worse Than Vinyl

Since Spotify music streams to your computer instead of playing locally, its quality varies with the bitrate. On the desktop app, the Standard setting for free users is 160 Kbps, while premium users can enjoy High quality at 320 Kbps. There are some people who say listening to music on vinyl is better than getting your music digitally because of the quality, but this isn't true.

Vinyl audio is uncompressed analog sound as opposed to Spotify's compressed, digital sound, and music purists insist that it's better. But can you really tell the difference? You might notice some dips at Normal quality, but you'd be hard-pressed to find someone who can tell the difference between a vinyl record and a high-quality Spotify stream. A good pair of headphones with Spotify lets you enjoy your music cleanly, and comes without the crackle sound that some of us find annoying.

Aside from pure quality, Spotify's digital music offers a ton of benefits over vinyl. Records aren't portable, require flipping to hear the entire album, and can cost $20 or more. A $10 Premium payment gets you a month of unlimited access to anything you want to listen to -- why would you pay double that for one album?

Myth 5: Spotify Is Faultless

After the above discussions, you might get the impression that we view Spotify as faultless -- this isn't so. While we think Premium is a worth the cost and love the new Discover features that help you find new music, it's an unfortunate truth that Spotify's user experience has gone downhill recently.

Spotify has removed a lot of features that were awesome for power users. It used to have an Apps section where you could download utilities to discover new music or look up lyrics right inside the Spotify window. After the Apps went away, Spotify integrated the Musixmatch service so you could still view lyrics in real-time. Then that suddenly disappeared, so now users are stuck looking up lyrics in another browser window.

The service has its own set of annoying errors that crop up sometimes. Last year, it also had a brief stint where ads were serving up malware. We've mentioned the holes in its catalog that you'll probably run into at some point. And don't even get us started on how lousy the new Spotify Web Player is.

What Do You Think You Know About Spotify?

We've discussed five myths that many people, including you, probably believe about Spotify. Whether you're a streaming aficionado and get all your music through the service or scoff at the idea of buying anything but physical records, there's something to learn here.

For me personally, Spotify provides a great value to access all the music I could want with the peace of mind that comes from knowing I'm supporting artists. It may be far from perfect, but it's the best way I can think of to listen to music right now.

Interested in a similar service? Check out our comparison of Spotify, Google Play Music, and Apple Music.

Are there any myths that you have heard about Spotify? What did you do to debunk them? What do you wish people would understand about the streaming service? Are you happy with the overall Spotify experience? Please add your thoughts in the comments below!

15 Windows Command Prompt (CMD) Commands You Must Know

The command prompt is still a powerful Windows tool. Here are the most useful CMD commands every Windows user needs to know.

Read Next

ShareTweetEmail

About The Author
Ben Stegner (1784 Articles Published)

Ben is a Deputy Editor and the Onboarding Manager at MakeUseOf. He left his IT job to write full-time in 2016 and has never looked back. He's been covering tech tutorials, video game recommendations, and more as a professional writer for over seven years.

More From Ben Stegner

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter for tech tips, reviews, free ebooks, and exclusive deals!

Click here to subscribe

Источник: https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/myths-about-spotify-busted/

Spotify premium ios download

With Spotify, you can play millions of songs and podcasts for free. Listen to the songs and podcasts you love and find music from all over the world. • Discover 

10 Oct 2019 Learn How to Download Spotify++ in iOS 13/ iOS 12 to get Spotify Premium Free on iOS 13 or iOS 12. Spotify is one of the best apps for 

Download and Install Latest Working Spotify++ on your Android as well as iOS Smartphone in 2019. Spotify++ Latest Crack Mod for iOS without TUTU geeks10.com

Download Spotify Premium Gratis iPhone – Bosan dengar lagu dari spotify banyak iklan dan banyak limitnya? Mau yang premium tapi gak mau ngeluarin uang  10 Mar 2018 Fortunately, there may be a tweak named Spotify++ that allow you to get Spotify premium for absolutely free. Spotify has two methods to pay  6 Jan 2020 With Spotify Premium, you can download songs, you won't be One way to enjoy Spotify Premium Free iOS 13 is to use an installer app to get  Then tap on the download button given above After that click on the install to install spotify++ ipa file on your iOS device. all premium features of Spotify app and  Stream, download, and discover your music with Spotify for iPhone. a free tier that's actually usable without restrictions, a Premium tier that gives so much for 

Podcasts. Download Spotify: Music and Podcasts and enjoy it on your iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch. Listen absolutely free with ads, or get Spotify Premium. 29 Nov 2019 Spotify Free users now can get 3 months free trial or 30 days free trial to feel the power of Spotify Premium, such as downloading Spotify music,  2 Oct 2019 Get a Rich Music Experience with Spotify++

Wikipedia

Multilingual free online encyclopedia

This article is about Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's home page, see Main Page. For the English edition, see English Wikipedia. For a list of Wikipedias in other languages, see List of Wikipedias. For other uses, see Wikipedia (disambiguation).

"The Free Encyclopedia" redirects here. For the concept of a free encyclopedia, see Encyclopedia § Free encyclopedias.

Wikipedia (wik-ih-PEE-dee-ə or wik-ee-) is a free content, multilingual online encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of volunteers through a model of open collaboration, using a wiki-based editing system. Individual contributors, also called editors, are known as Wikipedians. It is the largest and most-read reference work in history,[3] and consistently one of the 15 most popular websites ranked by Alexa; as of 2021,[update] Wikipedia was ranked the 13th most popular site.[3][4] A visitor spends an average time on Wikipedia of 3 minutes and 45 seconds each day.[5] It is hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, an American non-profit organization funded mainly through small donations.[6]

Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001, by Jimmy Wales[7] and Larry Sanger; Sanger coined its name as a blending of "wiki" and "encyclopedia".[8] Initially available only in English, versions in other languages were quickly developed. Its combined editions comprise more than 57 million articles, attracting around 2 billion unique device visits per month, and more than 17 million edits per month (1.9 edits per second).[10][11] In 2006, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world", and is "a testament to the vision of one man, Jimmy Wales".[12]

Wikipedia has received praise for its enablement of the democratization of knowledge, extent of coverage, unique structure, culture, and reduced amount of commercial bias, but criticism for exhibiting systemic bias, particularly gender bias against women and alleged ideological bias.[13][14]Its reliability was frequently criticized in the 2000s, but has improved over time and has been generally praised in the late 2010s and early 2020s.[3][13][15] Its coverage of controversial topics such as American politics and major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic has received substantial media attention. It has been censored by world governments, ranging from specific pages to the entire site. It has become an element of popular culture, with references in books, films and academic studies. In 2018, Facebook and YouTube announced that they would help users detect fake news by suggesting fact-checking links to related Wikipedia articles.[16][17]

History

Main article: History of Wikipedia

Nupedia

Main article: Nupedia

Logo reading "Nupedia.com the free encyclopedia" in blue with the large initial "N"
Wikipedia originally developed from another encyclopedia project called Nupedia.

Other collaborative online encyclopedias were attempted before Wikipedia, but none were as successful.[18] Wikipedia began as a complementary project for Nupedia, a free online English-language encyclopedia project whose articles were written by experts and reviewed under a formal process.[19] It was founded on March 9, 2000, under the ownership of Bomis, a web portal company. Its main figures were Bomis CEO Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, editor-in-chief for Nupedia and later Wikipedia.[1][20] Nupedia was initially licensed under its own Nupedia Open Content License, but even before Wikipedia was founded, Nupedia switched to the GNU Free Documentation License at the urging of Richard Stallman.[21] Wales is credited with defining the goal of making a publicly editable encyclopedia,[22][23] while Sanger is credited with the strategy of using a wiki to reach that goal.[24] On January 10, 2001, Sanger proposed on the Nupedia mailing list to create a wiki as a "feeder" project for Nupedia.[25]

Launch and early growth

The domainswikipedia.com (later redirecting to wikipedia.org) and wikipedia.org were registered on January 12, 2001,[26] and January 13, 2001,[27] respectively, and Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001[19] as a single English-language edition at www.wikipedia.com,[28] and announced by Sanger on the Nupedia mailing list.[22] Its policy of "neutral point-of-view"[29] was codified in its first few months. Otherwise, there were initially relatively few rules, and it operated independently of Nupedia.[22] Bomis originally intended it as a business for profit.[30]

The Wikipedia home page on December 20, 2001

English Wikipedia editors with >100 edits per month[31]

Wikipedia gained early contributors from Nupedia, Slashdot postings, and web search engine indexing. Language editions were also created, with a total of 161 by the end of 2004.[33] Nupedia and Wikipedia coexisted until the former's servers were taken down permanently in 2003, and its text was incorporated into Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia passed the mark of two million articles on September 9, 2007, making it the largest encyclopedia ever assembled, surpassing the Yongle Encyclopedia made during the Ming Dynasty in 1408, which had held the record for almost 600 years.[34]

Citing fears of commercial advertising and lack of control, users of the Spanish Wikipediaforked from Wikipedia to create Enciclopedia Libre in February 2002.[35] Wales then announced that Wikipedia would not display advertisements, and changed Wikipedia's domain from wikipedia.com to wikipedia.org.[36][37]

Though the English Wikipedia reached three million articles in August 2009, the growth of the edition, in terms of the numbers of new articles and of editors, appears to have peaked around early 2007.[38] Around 1,800 articles were added daily to the encyclopedia in 2006; by 2013 that average was roughly 800.[39] A team at the Palo Alto Research Center attributed this slowing of growth to the project's increasing exclusivity and resistance to change.[40] Others suggest that the growth is flattening naturally because articles that could be called "low-hanging fruit"—topics that clearly merit an article—have already been created and built up extensively.[41][42][43]

In November 2009, a researcher at the Rey Juan Carlos University in Madrid found that the English Wikipedia had lost 49,000 editors during the first three months of 2009; in comparison, it lost only 4,900 editors during the same period in 2008.[44][45]The Wall Street Journal cited the array of rules applied to editing and disputes related to such content among the reasons for this trend.[46] Wales disputed these claims in 2009, denying the decline and questioning the study's methodology.[47] Two years later, in 2011, he acknowledged a slight decline, noting a decrease from "a little more than 36,000 writers" in June 2010 to 35,800 in June 2011. In the same interview, he also claimed the number of editors was "stable and sustainable".[48] A 2013 MIT Technology Review article, "The Decline of Wikipedia", questioned this claim, revealing that since 2007, Wikipedia had lost a third of its volunteer editors, and that those remaining had focused increasingly on minutiae.[49] In July 2012, The Atlantic reported that the number of administrators was also in decline.[50] In the November 25, 2013, issue of New York magazine, Katherine Ward stated, "Wikipedia, the sixth-most-used website, is facing an internal crisis."[51]

Milestones

Cartogramshowing number of articles in each European language as of January 2019.[update]One square represents 10,000 articles. Languages with fewer than 10,000 articles are represented by one square. Languages are grouped by language family and each language family is presented by a separate color.

In January 2007, Wikipedia first became one of the ten most popular websites in the US, according to comscore Networks. With 42.9 million unique visitors, it was ranked #9, surpassing The New York Times (#10) and Apple (#11). This marked a significant increase over January 2006, when Wikipedia ranked 33rd, with around 18.3 million unique visitors.[52] As of March 2020[update], it ranked 13th[4] in popularity according to Alexa Internet. In 2014, it received eight billion page views every month.[53] On February 9, 2014, The New York Times reported that Wikipedia had 18 billion page views and nearly 500 million unique visitors a month, "according to the ratings firm comScore".[10] Loveland and Reagle argue that, in process, Wikipedia follows a long tradition of historical encyclopedias that have accumulated improvements piecemeal through "stigmergic accumulation".[54][55]

On January 18, 2012, the English Wikipedia participated in a series of coordinated protests against two proposed laws in the United States Congress—the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA)—by blacking out its pages for 24 hours.[56] More than 162 million people viewed the blackout explanation page that temporarily replaced its content.[57][58]

On January 20, 2014, Subodh Varma reporting for The Economic Times indicated that not only had Wikipedia's growth stalled, it "had lost nearly ten percent of its page views last year. There was a decline of about two billion between December 2012 and December 2013. Its most popular versions are leading the slide: page-views of the English Wikipedia declined by twelve percent, those of German version slid by 17 percent and the Japanese version lost nine percent."[59] Varma added, "While Wikipedia's managers think that this could be due to errors in counting, other experts feel that Google's Knowledge Graphs project launched last year may be gobbling up Wikipedia users."[59] When contacted on this matter, Clay Shirky, associate professor at New York University and fellow at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society said that he suspected much of the page-view decline was due to Knowledge Graphs, stating, "If you can get your question answered from the search page, you don't need to click [any further]."[59] By the end of December 2016, Wikipedia was ranked the 5th most popular website globally.[60]

In January 2013, 274301 Wikipedia, an asteroid, was named after Wikipedia; in October 2014, Wikipedia was honored with the Wikipedia Monument; and, in July 2015, 106 of the 7,473 700-page volumes of Wikipedia became available as Print Wikipedia. In April 2019, an Israeli lunar lander, Beresheet, crash landed on the surface of the Moon carrying a copy of nearly all of the English Wikipedia engraved on thin nickel plates; experts say the plates likely survived the crash.[61][62] In June 2019, scientists reported that all 16 GB of article text from the English Wikipedia had been encoded into synthetic DNA.[63]

Current state

On January 23, 2020, the English-language Wikipedia, which is the largest language section of the online encyclopedia, published its six millionth article.

By February 2020, Wikipedia ranked eleventh in the world in terms of Internet traffic.[64] As a key resource for disseminating information related to COVID-19, the World Health Organization has partnered with Wikipedia to help combat the spread of misinformation.[65][66]

Wikipedia accepts cryptocurrency donations and Basic Attention Token.[67][68][69]

Openness

Differences between versions of an article are highlighted

Unlike traditional encyclopedias, Wikipedia follows the procrastination principle[note 3] regarding the security of its content.[70]

Restrictions

Due to Wikipedia's increasing popularity, some editions, including the English version, have introduced editing restrictions for certain cases. For instance, on the English Wikipedia and some other language editions, only registered users may create a new article.[71] On the English Wikipedia, among others, particularly controversial, sensitive or vandalism-prone pages have been protected to varying degrees.[72][73] A frequently vandalized article can be "semi-protected" or "extended confirmed protected", meaning that only "autoconfirmed" or "extended confirmed" editors can modify it.[74] A particularly contentious article may be locked so that only administrators can make changes.[75] A 2021 article in the Columbia Journalism Review identified Wikipedia's page-protection policies as "[p]erhaps the most important" means at its disposal to "regulate its market of ideas".[76]

In certain cases, all editors are allowed to submit modifications, but review is required for some editors, depending on certain conditions. For example, the German Wikipedia maintains "stable versions" of articles[77] which have passed certain reviews. Following protracted trials and community discussion, the English Wikipedia introduced the "pending changes" system in December 2012. Under this system, new and unregistered users' edits to certain controversial or vandalism-prone articles are reviewed by established users before they are published.[79]

Wikipedia's editing interface

Review of changes

Although changes are not systematically reviewed, the software that powers Wikipedia provides tools allowing anyone to review changes made by others. Each article's History page links to each revision.[note 4][80] On most articles, anyone can undo others' changes by clicking a link on the article's History page. Anyone can view the latest changes to articles, and anyone registered may maintain a "watchlist" of articles that interest them so they can be notified of changes. "New pages patrol" is a process where newly created articles are checked for obvious problems.[81]

In 2003, economics Ph.D. student Andrea Ciffolilli argued that the low transaction costs of participating in a wiki created a catalyst for collaborative development, and that features such as allowing easy access to past versions of a page favored "creative construction" over "creative destruction".[82]

Vandalism

Main article: Vandalism on Wikipedia

Any change or edit that manipulates content in a way that purposefully compromises Wikipedia's integrity is considered vandalism. The most common and obvious types of vandalism include additions of obscenities and crude humor; it can also include advertising and other types of spam.[83] Sometimes editors commit vandalism by removing content or entirely blanking a given page. Less common types of vandalism, such as the deliberate addition of plausible but false information, can be more difficult to detect. Vandals can introduce irrelevant formatting, modify page semantics such as the page's title or categorization, manipulate the article's underlying code, or use images disruptively.[84]

Obvious vandalism is generally easy to remove from Wikipedia articles; the median time to detect and fix it is a few minutes.[85][86] However, some vandalism takes much longer to detect and repair.[87]

In the Seigenthaler biography incident, an anonymous editor introduced false information into the biography of American political figure John Seigenthaler in May 2005, falsely presenting him as a suspect in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.[87] It remained uncorrected for four months.[87] Seigenthaler, the founding editorial director of USA Today and founder of the Freedom ForumFirst Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University, called Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales and asked whether he had any way of knowing who contributed the misinformation. Wales said he did not, although the perpetrator was eventually traced.[88][89] After the incident, Seigenthaler described Wikipedia as "a flawed and irresponsible research tool".[87] The incident led to policy changes at Wikipedia for tightening up the verifiability of biographical articles of living people.[90]

In 2010, Daniel Tosh encouraged viewers of his show, Tosh.0, to visit the show's Wikipedia article and edit it at will. On a later episode, he commented on the edits to the article, most of them offensive, which had been made by the audience and had prompted the article to be locked from editing.[91][92]

Edit warring

Wikipedians often have disputes regarding content, which may result in repeated competing changes to an article, known as "edit warring".[93][94] It is widely seen as a resource-consuming scenario where no useful knowledge is added,[95] and criticized as creating a competitive[96] and conflict-based[97] editing culture associated with traditional masculine gender roles.[98]

Policies and laws

Content in Wikipedia is subject to the laws (in particular, copyright laws) of the United States and of the US state of Virginia, where the majority of Wikipedia's servers are located. Beyond legal matters, the editorial principles of Wikipedia are embodied in the "five pillars" and in numerous policies and guidelines intended to appropriately shape content. Even these rules are stored in wiki form, and Wikipedia editors write and revise the website's policies and guidelines.[99] Editors can enforce these rules by deleting or modifying non-compliant material. Originally, rules on the non-English editions of Wikipedia were based on a translation of the rules for the English Wikipedia. They have since diverged to some extent.[77]

Content policies and guidelines

According to the rules on the English Wikipedia, each entry in Wikipedia must be about a topic that is encyclopedic and is not a dictionary entry or dictionary-style.[100] A topic should also meet Wikipedia's standards of "notability",[101] which generally means that the topic must have been covered in mainstream media or major academic journal sources that are independent of the article's subject. Further, Wikipedia intends to convey only knowledge that is already established and recognized.[102] It must not present original research. A claim that is likely to be challenged requires a reference to a reliable source. Among Wikipedia editors, this is often phrased as "verifiability, not truth" to express the idea that the readers, not the encyclopedia, are ultimately responsible for checking the truthfulness of the articles and making their own interpretations.[103] This can at times lead to the removal of information that, though valid, is not properly sourced.[104] Finally, Wikipedia must not take sides.[105]

Governance

Further information: Wikipedia:Administration

Wikipedia's initial anarchy integrated democratic and hierarchical elements over time.[106][107] An article is not considered to be owned by its creator or any other editor, nor by the subject of the article.[108]

Administrators

Editors in good standing in the community can request extra user rights, granting them the technical ability to perform certain special actions. In particular, editors can choose to run for "adminship",[109][110] which includes the ability to delete pages or prevent them from being changed in cases of severe vandalism or editorial disputes. Administrators are not supposed to enjoy any special privilege in decision-making; instead, their powers are mostly limited to making edits that have project-wide effects and thus are disallowed to ordinary editors, and to implement restrictions intended to prevent disruptive editors from making unproductive edits.[111][112]

By 2012, fewer editors were becoming administrators compared to Wikipedia's earlier years, in part because the process of vetting potential administrators had become more rigorous.[113]

Dispute resolution

Over time, Wikipedia has developed a semiformal dispute resolution process. To determine community consensus, editors can raise issues at appropriate community forums,[note 5] seek outside input through third opinion requests, or initiate a more general community discussion known as a "request for comment".

Arbitration Committee

Main article: Arbitration Committee

The Arbitration Committee presides over the ultimate dispute resolution process. Although disputes usually arise from a disagreement between two opposing views on how an article should read, the Arbitration Committee explicitly refuses to directly rule on the specific view that should be adopted. Statistical analyses suggest that the committee ignores the content of disputes and rather focuses on the way disputes are conducted,[114] functioning not so much to resolve disputes and make peace between conflicting editors, but to weed out problematic editors while allowing potentially productive editors back in to participate. Therefore, the committee does not dictate the content of articles, although it sometimes condemns content changes when it deems the new content violates Wikipedia policies (for example, if the new content is considered biased). Its remedies include cautions and probations (used in 63% of cases) and banning editors from articles (43%), subject matters (23%), or Wikipedia (16%).[when?] Complete bans from Wikipedia are generally limited to instances of impersonation and anti-social behavior. When conduct is not impersonation or anti-social, but rather anti-consensus or in violation of editing policies, remedies tend to be limited to warnings.[115]

Main article: Wikipedia community

Each article and each user of Wikipedia has an associated "talk" page. These form the primary communication channel for editors to discuss, coordinate and debate.[116]

Wikipedia's community has been described as cultlike,[117] although not always with entirely negative connotations.[118] Its preference for cohesiveness, even if it requires compromise that includes disregard of credentials, has been referred to as "anti-elitism".[119]

Wikipedians sometimes award one another "virtual barnstars" for good work. These personalized tokens of appreciation reveal a wide range of valued work extending far beyond simple editing to include social support, administrative actions, and types of articulation work.[120]

Wikipedia does not require that its editors and contributors provide identification.[121] As Wikipedia grew, "Who writes Wikipedia?" became one of the questions frequently asked there.[122] Jimmy Wales once argued that only "a community ... a dedicated group of a few hundred volunteers" makes the bulk of contributions to Wikipedia and that the project is therefore "much like any traditional organization".[123] In 2008, a Slate magazine article reported that: "According to researchers in Palo Alto, one percent of Wikipedia users are responsible for about half of the site's edits."[124] This method of evaluating contributions was later disputed by Aaron Swartz, who noted that several articles he sampled had large portions of their content (measured by number of characters) contributed by users with low edit counts.[125]

The English Wikipedia has 6,409,211 articles, 42,559,880 registered editors, and 125,342 active editors. An editor is considered active if they have made one or more edits in the past 30 days.

Editors who fail to comply with Wikipedia cultural rituals, such as signing talk page comments, may implicitly signal that they are Wikipedia outsiders, increasing the odds that Wikipedia insiders may target or discount their contributions. Becoming a Wikipedia insider involves non-trivial costs: the contributor is expected to learn Wikipedia-specific technological codes, submit to a sometimes convoluted dispute resolution process, and learn a "baffling culture rich with in-jokes and insider references".[126] Editors who do not log in are in some sense second-class citizens on Wikipedia,[126] as "participants are accredited by members of the wiki community, who have a vested interest in preserving the quality of the work product, on the basis of their ongoing participation",[127] but the contribution histories of anonymous unregistered editors recognized only by their IP addresses cannot be attributed to a particular editor with certainty.

Studies

A 2007 study by researchers from Dartmouth College found that "anonymous and infrequent contributors to Wikipedia ... are as reliable a source of knowledge as those contributors who register with the site".[128] Jimmy Wales stated in 2009 that "[I]t turns out over 50% of all the edits are done by just .7% of the users ... 524 people ... And in fact, the most active 2%, which is 1400 people, have done 73.4% of all the edits."[123] However, Business Insider editor and journalist Henry Blodget showed in 2009 that in a random sample of articles, most Wikipedia content (measured by the amount of contributed text that survives to the latest sampled edit) is created by "outsiders", while most editing and formatting is done by "insiders".[123]

A 2008 study found that Wikipedians were less agreeable, open, and conscientious than others,[129][130] although a later commentary pointed out serious flaws, including that the data showed higher openness and that the differences with the control group and the samples were small.[131] According to a 2009 study, there is "evidence of growing resistance from the Wikipedia community to new content".[132]

Diversity

Several studies have shown that most Wikipedia contributors are male. Notably, the results of a Wikimedia Foundation survey in 2008 showed that only 13 percent of Wikipedia editors were female.[133] Because of this, universities throughout the United States tried to encourage women to become Wikipedia contributors. Similarly, many of these universities, including Yale and Brown, gave college credit to students who create or edit an article relating to women in science or technology.[134]Andrew Lih, a professor and scientist, wrote in The New York Times that the reason he thought the number of male contributors outnumbered the number of females so greatly was because identifying as a woman may expose oneself to "ugly, intimidating behavior".[135] Data has shown that Africans are underrepresented among Wikipedia editors.[136]

Language editions

Main article: List of Wikipedias

Most popular edition of Wikipedia by country in January 2021.
Most viewed editions of Wikipedia over time.
Most edited editions of Wikipedia over time.

There are currently 325 language editions of Wikipedia (also called language versions, or simply Wikipedias). As of November 2021, the six largest, in order of article count, are the English, Cebuano, Swedish, German, French, and Dutch Wikipedias.[138] The second and third-largest Wikipedias owe their position to the article-creating botLsjbot, which as of 2013[update] had created about half the articles on the Swedish Wikipedia, and most of the articles in the Cebuano and Waray Wikipedias. The latter are both languages of the Philippines.

In addition to the top six, twelve other Wikipedias have more than a million articles each (Russian, Spanish, Italian, Polish, Egyptian Arabic, Japanese, Vietnamese, Waray, Chinese, Arabic, Ukrainian and Portuguese), seven more have over 500,000 articles (Persian, Catalan, Serbian, Indonesian, Norwegian, Korean and Finnish), 44 more have over 100,000, and 82 more have over 10,000.[139][138] The largest, the English Wikipedia, has over 6.4 million articles. As of January 2021,[update] the English Wikipedia receives 48% of Wikipedia's cumulative traffic, with the remaining split among the other languages. The top 10 editions represent approximately 85% of the total traffic.[140]

0.1 0.3 1 3

English 6,409,211

Cebuano 6,060,605

Swedish 2,876,323

German 2,632,800

French 2,374,515

Dutch 2,071,460

Russian 1,770,848

Spanish 1,731,290

Italian 1,726,231

Polish 1,496,695

Egyptian Arabic 1,372,525

Japanese 1,300,750

Vietnamese 1,270,057

Waray 1,265,573

Chinese 1,241,305

Arabic 1,143,069

Ukrainian 1,122,940

Portuguese 1,077,306

Persian 846,511

Catalan 689,573

The unit for the numbers in bars is articles.

Since Wikipedia is based on the Web and therefore worldwide, contributors to the same language edition may use different dialects or may come from different countries (as is the case for the English edition). These differences may lead to some conflicts over spelling differences (e.g. colour versus color)[142] or points of view.[143]

Though the various language editions are held to global policies such as "neutral point of view", they diverge on some points of policy and practice, most notably on whether images that are not licensed freely may be used under a claim of fair use.[144][145][146]

Jimmy Wales has described Wikipedia as "an effort to create and distribute a free encyclopedia of the highest possible quality to every single person on the planet in their own language".[147] Though each language edition functions more or less independently, some efforts are made to supervise them all. They are coordinated in part by Meta-Wiki, the Wikimedia Foundation's wiki devoted to maintaining all its projects (Wikipedia and others).[148] For instance, Meta-Wiki provides important statistics on all language editions of Wikipedia,[149] and it maintains a list of articles every Wikipedia should have.[150] The list concerns basic content by subject: biography, history, geography, society, culture, science, technology, and mathematics. It is not rare for articles strongly related to a particular language not to have counterparts in another edition. For example, articles about small towns in the United States might be available only in English, even when they meet the notability criteria of other language Wikipedia projects.

Estimation of contributions shares from different regions in the world to different Wikipedia editions[151]

Translated articles represent only a small portion of articles in most editions, in part because those editions do not allow fully automated translation of articles. Articles available in more than one language may offer "interwiki links", which link to the counterpart articles in other editions.[citation needed]

A study published by PLOS One in 2012 also estimated the share of contributions to different editions of Wikipedia from different regions of the world. It reported that the proportion of the edits made from North America was 51% for the English Wikipedia, and 25% for the simple English Wikipedia.[151]

English Wikipedia editor numbers

Number of editors on the English Wikipedia over time.

On March 1, 2014, The Economist, in an article titled "The Future of Wikipedia", cited a trend analysis concerning data published by the Wikimedia Foundation stating that "[t]he number of editors for the English-language version has fallen by a third in seven years."[152] The attrition rate for active editors in English Wikipedia was cited by The Economist as substantially in contrast to statistics for Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia). The Economist reported that the number of contributors with an average of five or more edits per month was relatively constant since 2008 for Wikipedia in other languages at approximately 42,000 editors within narrow seasonal variances of about 2,000 editors up or down. The number of active editors in English Wikipedia, by sharp comparison, was cited as peaking in 2007 at approximately 50,000 and dropping to 30,000 by the start of 2014.

In contrast, the trend analysis published in The Economist presents Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) as successful in retaining their active editors on a renewable and sustained basis, with their numbers remaining relatively constant at approximately 42,000.[152] No comment was made concerning which of the differentiated edit policy standards from Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) would provide a possible alternative to English Wikipedia for effectively ameliorating substantial editor attrition rates on the English-language Wikipedia.[153]

Reception

See also: Academic studies about Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia

Ambox current red Americas.svg

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2018)

Various Wikipedians have criticized Wikipedia's large and growing regulation, which includes more than fifty policies and nearly 150,000 words as of 2014.[update][154][155]

Critics have stated that Wikipedia exhibits systemic bias. In 2010, columnist and journalist Edwin Black described Wikipedia as being a mixture of "truth, half-truth, and some falsehoods".[156] Articles in The Chronicle of Higher Education and The Journal of Academic Librarianship have criticized Wikipedia's "Undue Weight" policy, concluding that the fact that Wikipedia explicitly is not designed to provide correct information about a subject, but rather focus on all the major viewpoints on the subject, give less attention to minor ones, and creates omissions that can lead to false beliefs based on incomplete information.[157][158][159]

Journalists Oliver Kamm and Edwin Black alleged (in 2010 and 2011 respectively) that articles are dominated by the loudest and most persistent voices, usually by a group with an "ax to grind" on the topic.[156][160] A 2008 article in Education Next Journal concluded that as a resource about controversial topics, Wikipedia is subject to manipulation and spin.[161]

In 2020, Omer Benjakob and Stephen Harrison noted that "Media coverage of Wikipedia has radically shifted over the past two decades: once cast as an intellectual frivolity, it is now lauded as the 'last bastion of shared reality' online."[162]

In 2006, the Wikipedia Watch criticism website listed dozens of examples of plagiarism in the English Wikipedia.[163]

Accuracy of content

Main article: Reliability of Wikipedia

Articles for traditional encyclopedias such as Encyclopædia Britannica are written by experts, lending such encyclopedias a reputation for accuracy.[164] However, a peer review in 2005 of forty-two scientific entries on both Wikipedia and Encyclopædia Britannica by the science journal Nature found few differences in accuracy, and concluded that "the average science entry in Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies; Britannica, about three."[165] Joseph Reagle suggested that while the study reflects "a topical strength of Wikipedia contributors" in science articles, "Wikipedia may not have fared so well using a random sampling of articles or on humanities subjects."[166] Others raised similar critiques.[167] The findings by Nature were disputed by Encyclopædia Britannica,[168][169] and in response, Nature gave a rebuttal of the points raised by Britannica.[170] In addition to the point-for-point disagreement between these two parties, others have examined the sample size and selection method used in the Nature effort, and suggested a "flawed study design" (in Nature's manual selection of articles, in part or in whole, for comparison), absence of statistical analysis (e.g., of reported confidence intervals), and a lack of study "statistical power" (i.e., owing to small sample size, 42 or 4 × 101 articles compared, vs >105 and >106 set sizes for Britannica and the English Wikipedia, respectively).[171]

As a consequence of the open structure, Wikipedia "makes no guarantee of validity" of its content, since no one is ultimately responsible for any claims appearing in it.[172] Concerns have been raised by PC World in 2009 regarding the lack of accountability that results from users' anonymity,[173] the insertion of false information,[174]vandalism, and similar problems.

Economist Tyler Cowen wrote: "If I had to guess whether Wikipedia or the median refereed journal article on economics was more likely to be true after a not so long think I would opt for Wikipedia." He comments that some traditional sources of non-fiction suffer from systemic biases, and novel results, in his opinion, are over-reported in journal articles as well as relevant information being omitted from news reports. However, he also cautions that errors are frequently found on Internet sites and that academics and experts must be vigilant in correcting them.[175]Amy Bruckman has argued that, due to the number of reviewers, "the content of a popular Wikipedia page is actually the most reliable form of information ever created".[176]

Critics argue that Wikipedia's open nature and a lack of proper sources for most of the information makes it unreliable.[177] Some commentators suggest that Wikipedia may be reliable, but that the reliability of any given article is not clear.[178] Editors of traditional reference works such as the Encyclopædia Britannica have questioned the project's utility and status as an encyclopedia.[179] Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has claimed that Wikipedia has largely avoided the problem of "fake news" because the Wikipedia community regularly debates the quality of sources in articles.[180]

Wikipedia's open structure inherently makes it an easy target for Internet trolls, spammers, and various forms of paid advocacy seen as counterproductive to the maintenance of a neutral and verifiable online encyclopedia.[80][182] In response to paid advocacy editing and undisclosed editing issues, Wikipedia was reported in an article in The Wall Street Journal, to have strengthened its rules and laws against undisclosed editing.[183] The article stated that: "Beginning Monday [from the date of the article, June 16, 2014], changes in Wikipedia's terms of use will require anyone paid to edit articles to disclose that arrangement. Katherine Maher, the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation's chief communications officer, said the changes address a sentiment among volunteer editors that, 'we're not an advertising service; we're an encyclopedia.'"[183][184][185][186][187] These issues, among others, had been parodied since the first decade of Wikipedia, notably by Stephen Colbert on The Colbert Report.[188]

A Harvard law textbook, Legal Research in a Nutshell (2011), cites Wikipedia as a "general source" that "can be a real boon" in "coming up to speed in the law governing a situation" and, "while not authoritative, can provide basic facts as well as leads to more in-depth resources".[189]

Discouragement in education

Ambox current red Americas.svg

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(December 2020)

Most university lecturers discourage students from citing any encyclopedia in academic work, preferring primary sources;[190] some specifically prohibit Wikipedia citations. Wales stresses that encyclopedias of any type are not usually appropriate to use as citable sources, and should not be relied upon as authoritative.[193] Wales once (2006 or earlier) said he receives about ten emails weekly from students saying they got failing grades on papers because they cited Wikipedia; he told the students they got what they deserved. "For God's sake, you're in college; don't cite the encyclopedia," he said.[194]

In February 2007, an article in The Harvard Crimson newspaper reported that a few of the professors at Harvard University were including Wikipedia articles in their syllabi, although without realizing the articles might change.[195] In June 2007, former president of the American Library AssociationMichael Gorman condemned Wikipedia, along with Google,[196] stating that academics who endorse the use of Wikipedia are "the intellectual equivalent of a dietitian who recommends a steady diet of Big Macs with everything".

In contrast, academic writing[clarification needed] in Wikipedia has evolved in recent years and has been found to increase student interest, personal connection to the product, creativity in material processing, and international collaboration in the learning process.[197]

Medical information

See also: Health information on Wikipedia

On March 5, 2014, Julie Beck writing for The Atlantic magazine in an article titled "Doctors' #1 Source for Healthcare Information: Wikipedia", stated that "Fifty percent of physicians look up conditions on the (Wikipedia) site, and some are editing articles themselves to improve the quality of available information."[198] Beck continued to detail in this article new programs of Amin Azzam at the University of San Francisco to offer medical school courses to medical students for learning to edit and improve Wikipedia articles on health-related issues, as well as internal quality control programs within Wikipedia organized by James Heilman to improve a group of 200 health-related articles of central medical importance up to Wikipedia's highest standard of articles using its Featured Article and Good Article peer-review evaluation process.[198] In a May 7, 2014, follow-up article in The Atlantic titled "Can Wikipedia Ever Be a Definitive Medical Text?", Julie Beck quotes WikiProject Medicine's James Heilman as stating: "Just because a reference is peer-reviewed doesn't mean it's a high-quality reference."[199] Beck added that: "Wikipedia has its own peer review process before articles can be classified as 'good' or 'featured'. Heilman, who has participated in that process before, says 'less than one percent' of Wikipedia's medical articles have passed."[199]

Quality of writing

Screenshot of English Wikipedia's article on Earth, a featured-class article

In a 2006 mention of Jimmy Wales, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world".[200]

In 2008, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University found that the quality of a Wikipedia article would suffer rather than gain from adding more writers when the article lacked appropriate explicit or implicit coordination.[201] For instance, when contributors rewrite small portions of an entry rather than making full-length revisions, high- and low-quality content may be intermingled within an entry. Roy Rosenzweig, a history professor, stated that American National Biography Online outperformed Wikipedia in terms of its "clear and engaging prose", which, he said, was an important aspect of good historical writing.[202] Contrasting Wikipedia's treatment of Abraham Lincoln to that of Civil War historian James McPherson in American National Biography Online, he said that both were essentially accurate and covered the major episodes in Lincoln's life, but praised "McPherson's richer contextualization ... his artful use of quotations to capture Lincoln's voice ... and ... his ability to convey a profound message in a handful of words." By contrast, he gives an example of Wikipedia's prose that he finds "both verbose and dull". Rosenzweig also criticized the "waffling—encouraged by the NPOV policy—[which] means that it is hard to discern any overall interpretive stance in Wikipedia history". While generally praising the article on William Clarke Quantrill, he quoted its conclusion as an example of such "waffling", which then stated: "Some historians ... remember him as an opportunistic, bloodthirsty outlaw, while others continue to view him as a daring soldier and local folk hero."[202]

Other critics have made similar charges that, even if Wikipedia articles are factually accurate, they are often written in a poor, almost unreadable style. Frequent Wikipedia critic Andrew Orlowski commented, "Even when a Wikipedia entry is 100 percent factually correct, and those facts have been carefully chosen, it all too often reads as if it has been translated from one language to another then into a third, passing an illiterate translator at each stage."[203] A study of Wikipedia articles on cancer was conducted in 2010 by Yaacov Lawrence of the Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University. The study was limited to those articles that could be found in the Physician Data Query and excluded those written at the "start" class or "stub" class level. Lawrence found the articles accurate but not very readable, and thought that "Wikipedia's lack of readability (to non-college readers) may reflect its varied origins and haphazard editing".[204]The Economist argued that better-written articles tend to be more reliable: "inelegant or ranting prose usually reflects muddled thoughts and incomplete information".[205]

Coverage of topics and systemic bias

See also: Notability in the English Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia § Systemic bias in coverage

Ambox current red Americas.svg

Parts of this article (those related to d:Wikidata:Statistics/Wikipedia) need to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2017)

Wikipedia seeks to create a summary of all human knowledge in the form of an online encyclopedia, with each topic covered encyclopedically in one article. Since it has terabytes of disk space, it can have far more topics than can be covered by any printed encyclopedia.[206] The exact degree and manner of coverage on Wikipedia is under constant review by its editors, and disagreements are not uncommon (see deletionism and inclusionism).[207][208] Wikipedia contains materials that some people may find objectionable, offensive, or pornographic. The "Wikipedia is not censored" policy has sometimes proved controversial: in 2008, Wikipedia rejected an online petition against the inclusion of images of Muhammad in the English edition of its Muhammad article, citing this policy. The presence of politically, religiously, and pornographically sensitive materials in Wikipedia has led to the censorship of Wikipedia by national authorities in China[209] and Pakistan,[210] amongst other countries.

A 2008 study conducted by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and Palo Alto Research Center gave a distribution of topics as well as growth (from July 2006 to January 2008) in each field:[211]

  • Culture and Arts: 30% (210%)
  • Biographies and persons: 15% (97%)
  • Geography and places: 14% (52%)
  • Society and social sciences: 12% (83%)
  • History and events: 11% (143%)
  • Natural and Physical Sciences: 9% (213%)
  • Technology and Applied Science: 4% (−6%)
  • Religions and belief systems: 2% (38%)
  • Health: 2% (42%)
  • Mathematics and logic: 1% (146%)
  • Thought and Philosophy: 1% (160%)

These numbers refer only to the number of articles: it is possible for one topic to contain a large number of short articles and another to contain a small number of large ones. Through its "Wikipedia Loves Libraries" program, Wikipedia has partnered with major public libraries such as the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts to expand its coverage of underrepresented subjects and articles.[212]

A 2011 study conducted by researchers at the University of Minnesota indicated that male and female editors focus on different coverage topics. There was a greater concentration of females in the "people and arts" category, while males focus more on "geography and science".[213]

Coverage of topics and selection bias

Research conducted by Mark Graham of the Oxford Internet Institute in 2009 indicated that the geographic distribution of article topics is highly uneven. Africa is the most underrepresented.[214] Across 30 language editions of Wikipedia, historical articles and sections are generally Eurocentric and focused on recent events.[215]

An editorial in The Guardian in 2014 claimed that more effort went into providing references for a list of female porn actors than a list of women writers.[216] Data has also shown that Africa-related material often faces omission; a knowledge gap that a July 2018 Wikimedia conference in Cape Town sought to address.[136]

Systemic biases

When multiple editors contribute to one topic or set of topics, systemic bias may arise, due to the demographic backgrounds of the editors. In 2011, Wales claimed that the unevenness of coverage is a reflection of the demography of the editors, citing for example "biographies of famous women through history and issues surrounding early childcare".[48] The October 22, 2013, essay by Tom Simonite in MIT's Technology Review titled "The Decline of Wikipedia" discussed the effect of systemic bias and policy creep on the downward trend in the number of editors.[49]

Systemic bias on Wikipedia may follow that of culture generally,[vague] for example favoring certain nationalities, ethnicities or majority religions.[217] It may more specifically follow the biases of Internet culture, inclining to be young, male, English-speaking, educated, technologically aware, and wealthy enough to spare time for editing. Biases, intrinsically, may include an overemphasis on topics such as pop culture, technology, and current events.[217]

Taha Yasseri of the University of Oxford, in 2013, studied the statistical trends of systemic bias at Wikipedia introduced by editing conflicts and their resolution.[218][219] His research examined the counterproductive work behavior of edit warring. Yasseri contended that simple reverts or "undo" operations were not the most significant measure of counterproductive behavior at Wikipedia and relied instead on the statistical measurement of detecting "reverting/reverted pairs" or "mutually reverting edit pairs". Such a "mutually reverting edit pair" is defined where one editor reverts the edit of another editor who then, in sequence, returns to revert the first editor in the "mutually reverting edit pairs". The results were tabulated for several language versions of Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia's three largest conflict rates belonged to the articles George W. Bush, anarchism, and Muhammad.[219] By comparison, for the German Wikipedia, the three largest conflict rates at the time of the Oxford study were for the articles covering Croatia, Scientology, and 9/11 conspiracy theories.[219]

Researchers from Washington University developed a statistical model to measure systematic bias in the behavior of Wikipedia's users regarding controversial topics. The authors focused on behavioral changes of the encyclopedia's administrators after assuming the post, writing that systematic bias occurred after the fact.[220][221]

Explicit content

See also: Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia and Reporting of child pornography images on Wikimedia Commons

"Wikipedia censorship" redirects here. For the government censorship of Wikipedia, see Censorship of Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's policy concerning censorship, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not censored

Wikipedia has been criticized for allowing information about graphic content. Articles depicting what some critics have called objectionable content (such as feces, cadaver, human penis, vulva, and nudity) contain graphic pictures and detailed information easily available to anyone with access to the internet, including children.

The site also includes sexual content such as images and videos of masturbation and ejaculation, illustrations of zoophilia, and photos from hardcore pornographic films in its articles. It also has non-sexual photographs of nude children.

The Wikipedia article about Virgin Killer—a 1976 album from the GermanrockbandScorpions—features a picture of the album's original cover, which depicts a naked prepubescent girl. The original release cover caused controversy and was replaced in some countries. In December 2008, access to the Wikipedia article Virgin Killer was blocked for four days by most Internet service providers in the United Kingdom after the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) decided the album cover was a potentially illegal indecent image and added the article's URL to a "blacklist" it supplies to British internet service providers.[222]

In April 2010, Sanger wrote a letter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, outlining his concerns that two categories of images on Wikimedia Commons contained child pornography, and were in violation of US federal obscenity law.[223][224] Sanger later clarified that the images, which were related to pedophilia and one about lolicon, were not of real children, but said that they constituted "obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children", under the PROTECT Act of 2003.[225] That law bans photographic child pornography and cartoon images and drawings of children that are obscene under American law.[225] Sanger also expressed concerns about access to the images on Wikipedia in schools.[226]Wikimedia Foundation spokesman Jay Walsh strongly rejected Sanger's accusation,[227] saying that Wikipedia did not have "material we would deem to be illegal. If we did, we would remove it."[227] Following the complaint by Sanger, Wales deleted sexual images without consulting the community. After some editors who volunteer to maintain the site argued that the decision to delete had been made hastily, Wales voluntarily gave up some of the powers he had held up to that time as part of his co-founder status. He wrote in a message to the Wikimedia Foundation mailing-list that this action was "in the interest of encouraging this discussion to be about real philosophical/content issues, rather than be about me and how quickly I acted".[228] Critics, including Wikipediocracy, noticed that many of the pornographic images deleted from Wikipedia since 2010 have reappeared.[229]

Privacy

One privacy concern in the case of Wikipedia is the right of a private citizen to remain a "private citizen" rather than a "public figure" in the eyes of the law.[230][note 6] It is a battle between the right to be anonymous in cyberspace and the right to be anonymous in real life ("meatspace"). A particular problem occurs in the case of a relatively unimportant individual and for whom there exists a Wikipedia page against her or his wishes.

In January 2006, a German court ordered the German Wikipedia shut down within Germany because it stated the full name of Boris Floricic, aka "Tron", a deceased hacker. On February 9, 2006, the injunction against Wikimedia Deutschland was overturned, with the court rejecting the notion that Tron's right to privacy or that of his parents was being violated.[231]

Wikipedia has a "Volunteer Response Team" that uses Znuny, a free and open-source software fork of OTRS[232] to handle queries without having to reveal the identities of the involved parties. This is used, for example, in confirming the permission for using individual images and other media in the project.[233]

Sexism

Main article: Gender bias on Wikipedia

Wikipedia was described in 2015 as harboring a battleground culture of sexism and harassment.[234][235]

The perceived toxic attitudes and tolerance of violent and abusive language were reasons put forth in 2013 for the gender gap in Wikipedia editorship.[236]

Edit-a-thons have been held to encourage female editors and increase the coverage of women's topics.[237]

A comprehensive 2008 survey, published in 2016, found significant gender differences in: confidence in expertise, discomfort with editing, and response to critical feedback. "Women reported less confidence in their expertise, expressed greater discomfort with editing (which typically involves conflict), and reported more negative responses to critical feedback compared to men."[238]

Operation

Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia movement affiliates

Main article: Wikimedia Foundation

Wikipedia is hosted and funded by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization which also operates Wikipedia-related projects such as Wiktionary and Wikibooks. The foundation relies on public contributions and grants to fund its mission.[239] The foundation's 2013 IRS Form 990 shows revenue of $39.7 million and expenses of almost $29 million, with assets of $37.2 million and liabilities of about $2.3 million.[240]

In May 2014, Wikimedia Foundation named Lila Tretikov as its second executive director, taking over for Sue Gardner.[241] The Wall Street Journal reported on May 1, 2014, that Tretikov's information technology background from her years at University of California offers Wikipedia an opportunity to develop in more concentrated directions guided by her often repeated position statement that, "Information, like air, wants to be free."[242][243] The same Wall Street Journal article reported these directions of development according to an interview with spokesman Jay Walsh of Wikimedia, who "said Tretikov would address that issue (paid advocacy) as a priority. 'We are really pushing toward more transparency ... We are reinforcing that paid advocacy is not welcome.' Initiatives to involve greater diversity of contributors, better mobile support of Wikipedia, new geo-location tools to find local content more easily, and more tools for users in the second and third world are also priorities," Walsh said.[242]

Following the departure of Tretikov from Wikipedia due to issues concerning the use of the "superprotection" feature which some language versions of Wikipedia have adopted, Katherine Maher became the third executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation in June 2016.[244] Maher has stated that one of her priorities would be the issue of editor harassment endemic to Wikipedia as identified by the Wikipedia board in December. Maher stated regarding the harassment issue that: "It establishes a sense within the community that this is a priority ... (and that correction requires that) it has to be more than words."[245]

Wikipedia is also supported by many organizations and groups that are affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation but independently-run, called Wikimedia movement affiliates. These include Wikimedia chapters (which are national or sub-national organizations, such as Wikimedia Deutschland and Wikimédia France), thematic organizations (such as Amical Wikimedia for the Catalan language community), and user groups. These affiliates participate in the promotion, development, and funding of Wikipedia.

Software operations and support

See also: MediaWiki

The operation of Wikipedia depends on MediaWiki, a custom-made, free and open sourcewiki software platform written in PHP and built upon the MySQL database system.[246] The software incorporates programming features such as a macro language, variables, a transclusion system for templates, and URL redirection. MediaWiki is licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL) and it is used by all Wikimedia projects, as well as many other wiki projects. Originally, Wikipedia ran on UseModWiki written in Perl by Clifford Adams (Phase I), which initially required CamelCase for article hyperlinks; the present double bracket style was incorporated later. Starting in January 2002 (Phase II), Wikipedia began running on a PHP wiki engine with a MySQL database; this software was custom-made for Wikipedia by Magnus Manske. The Phase II software was repeatedly modified to accommodate the exponentially increasing demand. In July 2002 (Phase III), Wikipedia shifted to the third-generation software, MediaWiki, originally written by Lee Daniel Crocker.

Several MediaWiki extensions are installed[247] to extend the functionality of the MediaWiki software.

In April 2005, a Lucene extension[248][249] was added to MediaWiki's built-in search and Wikipedia switched from MySQL to Lucene for searching. Lucene was later replaced by CirrusSearch which is based on Elasticsearch.[250]

In July 2013, after extensive beta testing, a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) extension, VisualEditor, was opened to public use.[251][252][253][254] It was met with much rejection and criticism, and was described as "slow and buggy".[255] The feature was changed from opt-out to opt-in afterward.

Automated editing

Main article: Wikipedia bots

Computer programs called bots have often been used to perform simple and repetitive tasks, such as correcting common misspellings and stylistic issues, or to start articles such as geography entries in a standard format from statistical data.[256][257][258] One controversial contributor, Sverker Johansson, creating articles with his bot was reported to create up to 10,000 articles on the Swedish Wikipedia on certain days.[259] Additionally, there are bots designed to automatically notify editors when they make common editing errors (such as unmatched quotes or unmatched parentheses).[260] Edits falsely identified by bots as the work of a banned editor can be restored by other editors. An anti-vandal bot is programmed to detect and revert vandalism quickly.[257] Bots are able to indicate edits from particular accounts or IP address ranges, as occurred at the time of the shooting down of the MH17 jet incident in July 2014 when it was reported that edits were made via IPs controlled by the Russian government.[261] Bots on Wikipedia must be approved before activation.[262]

According to Andrew Lih, the current expansion of Wikipedia to millions of articles would be difficult to envision without the use of such bots.[263]

Hardware operations and support

See also: Wikimedia Foundation § Hardware

Wikipedia receives between 25,000 and 60,000-page requests per second, depending on the time of the day.[264][needs update] As of 2021,

Источник: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia
  • cell tower

    Security

    Most SS7 exploit service providers on dark web are scammers

    The existence of Signaling System 7 (SS7) mobile telephony protocol vulnerabilities is something security researchers warned about in 2016, and it only took a year before the first attacks exploiting them were observed.

  • Hacker

    Security

    Russian ransomware gangs start collaborating with Chinese hackers

    ​There's some unusual activity brewing on Russian-speaking cybercrime forums, where hackers appear to be reaching out to Chinese counterparts for collaboration.

  • TikTok

    Security

    TikTok phishing threatens to delete influencers’ accounts

    Researchers have observed a new phishing campaign primarily targeting high-profile TikTok accounts belonging to influencers, brand consultants, production studios, and influencers' managers.

  • Cryptocurrency

    Legal, CryptoCurrency

    Victims of $2 billion BitConnect fraud to get back $57 million

    U.S. law enforcement authorities will start liquidating roughly $57 million worth of cryptocurrency seized from the now-defunct BitConnect crypto exchange to provide some restitution to defrauded investors.

  • Iran fingerprint

    Security

    US, UK warn of Iranian hackers exploiting Microsoft Exchange, Fortinet

    US, UK, and Australian cybersecurity agencies warned today of ongoing exploitation of Microsoft Exchange ProxyShell and Fortinet vulnerabilities linked to an Iranian-backed hacking group.

  • CISA

    Security

    CISA releases cybersecurity response plans for federal agencies

    The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has released new cybersecurity response plans (known as playbooks) for federal civilian executive branch (FCEB) agencies.

  • Data

    Deals

    Save 97% off a course bundle that covers all things computer science

    The 2022 Premium Computer Science Career Path Certification Bundle offers comprehensive computer science education without burning a hole in your pocket. Its courses cost $1,800 individually, but you can get them today for just $39.99.

    • BleepingComputer Deals
    • November 17, 2021
    • 07:17 AM
  • Microsoft starts rolling out a new Windows 11 media player

    Microsoft, Software

    Microsoft starts rolling out a new Windows 11 media player

    Microsoft is now rolling out a new media player that matches Windows 11's look and feel as a replacement for the Windows 10 Groove Music and (in the future) the legacy Windows Media Player app.

  • Hacker

    Security

    Threat actors offer millions for zero-days, developers talk of exploit-as-a-service

    While mostly hidden in private conversations, details sometimes emerge about the parallel economy of vulnerability exploits on underground forums, revealing just how fat of a wallet some threat actors have.

  • Windows 11 bug break glass

    Microsoft

    Windows 11 issue with Intel audio drivers triggers blue screens

    Microsoft has confirmed a new known issue impacting Windows 11 customers and triggering to blue screens of death (BSODs) on affected systems.

  • Emotet

    Security

    Here are the new Emotet spam campaigns hitting mailboxes worldwide

    The Emotet malware kicked into action yesterday after a ten-month hiatus with multiple spam campaigns delivering malicious documents to mailboxes worldwide.

  • Windows 10

    Microsoft

    Windows 10 21H2 is released, here are the new features

    Microsoft has released Windows 10 21H2, also known as the November 2021 Update, and it is available to users running Windows 10 2004 or later as an optional update in Windows Update.

  • Google Chrome Flare

    Google, Software

    Google Chrome 96 breaks Twitter, Discord, video rendering and more

    Google Chrome 96 was released yesterday, and users are reporting problems with Twitter, Discord, and Instagram caused by the new version.

  • Iran Flag

    Security, Microsoft

    Microsoft warns of the evolution of six Iranian hacking groups

    The Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center (MSTIC) has presented an analysis of the evolution of several Iranian threat actors at the CyberWarCon 2021, and their findings show increasingly sophisticated attacks.

  • WordPress

    Security

    WordPress sites are being hacked in fake ransomware attacks

    A new wave of attacks starting late last week has hacked close to 300 WordPress sites to display fake encryption notices, trying to trick the site owners into paying 0.1 bitcoin for restoration.

  • washing_machine

    Security

    These are the cryptomixers hackers use to clean their ransoms

    Cryptomixers have always been at the epicenter of cybercrime activity, allowing hackers to "clean" cryptocurrency stolen from victims and making it hard for law enforcement to track them.

  • Artificial Intelligence AI

    Microsoft, Security

    Microsoft adds AI-driven ransomware protection to Defender

    Microsoft has introduced an AI-driven ransomware attack detection system for Microsoft Defender for Endpoint customers that complements existing cloud protection by evaluating risks and blocking actors at the perimeter.

  • NPM

    Security

    NPM fixes private package names leak, serious authorization bug

    The largest software registry of Node.js packages, npm, has disclosed fixing multiple security flaws. The first flaw concerns leak of names of private npm packages on the npmjs.com's "replica" server. Whereas, the second flaw allows attackers to publish new versions of any existing npm package that they do not own or have rights to.

  • IT Courses programming

    Deals

    This jam packed course bundle teaches programming for $45

    The 2022 All-in-One Learn to Code Certification Bundle, you can hone your tech skills and pile up your expertise with 15 premium courses that focus on various languages and tech concepts, including NFT, JavaScript, DApp, and AWS. The collection is worth $3,000 altogether, but you can get it today for just $44.99.

    • BleepingComputer Deals
    • November 16, 2021
    • 07:34 AM
  • hammers

    Security, Hardware

    New Rowhammer technique bypasses existing DDR4 memory defenses

    Researchers have developed a new fuzzing-based technique called 'Blacksmith' that revives Rowhammer vulnerability attacks against modern DRAM devices that bypasses existing mitigations.

View More
Источник: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/

Tableau for Students

Academic Programs

Download Tableau Desktop and Tableau Prep Builder to gain data skills

We offer free one-year Tableau licenses to students at accredited academic institutions through our Tableau for Students program. Receive access to our entire eLearning suite once verified.

FEATURED CONTENT

Student Stories

This summer, we reached out to our student community and asked them to tell us about their journey with data, and to see what advice they have for students interested in learning data analytics. And as we head into sunny weather and end a very trying year, we couldn’t think of a better time to celebrate with our students.

watch now

Use Tableau

In class

Go the extra mile for class assignments by analyzing your data with Tableau. With Tableau’s intuitive, user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, you’ll analyze and present with ease.

At home

Tableau is an in-demand skill that you can learn while studying from home. With new access to eLearning, you can gain valuable data skills at your own pace.

Data Literacy for All

Learn foundational skills to jumpstart your data journey

Learn data skills fundamentals with this free online training program. This self-paced course will teach you how to explore, understand, and communicate with data. Training covers key topics, including statistics, understanding data types, and communicating with data.

Start learning now

Matt Farkas from Spotify

Hear how Matt Farkas, a recent graduate of Northwestern University, learned Tableau and got a data science internship at Spotify.

Watch Now


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

My Tableau Student License has expired! How do I renew my student license?

To extend or renew your Tableau student license, simply re-submit this Tableau for Students form to verify you’re still enrolled. www.tableau.com/studentlicense

My product key is invalid

If you’re receiving the error “the product key is invalid” it may be because the current version you have installed is an older version of Tableau. Please check out our Knowledge Base Page for additional support on how to resolve your issue.

If these steps don’t work, please feel free to submit a support case here. Enter “installation” or other keywords into the search bar to help find your answer. If you cannot find correct documentation, feel free to submit a support case on the “continue to create case” button and a member of our Technical Support team will be with you shortly.

Can I install Tableau on more than one device?

You are only allowed up to two activations with the same product key. This means you can install Tableau on up to two devices. If you have reached the maximum activations, and wish to install on another device, you must deactivate one of those activations. If you need assistance moving or deactivating Tableau on a machine, you can get more information here.

What is eLearning and how do I use it?

Tableau eLearning is web-based training you can consume at your own pace. Courses are interactive and designed to help you learn Tableau, regardless of skill level. Once verified through our Tableau for Students program, you will receive a code and instructions on how to register at the Tableau Learning Center. For more information about eLearning, take a look at our eLearning page.

What's the best way to get started learning with Tableau as a student?

We recommend activating your eLearning license when you start using Tableau. Also, check out the student resource page for example data sets and additional free training.

Can I get a student discount for the Tableau Desktop Specialist Certification?

We are currently offering a 20% discount on the Tableau Desktop Specialist Exam to students. We do not offer discounts on the other exams at this time.

Please check out the Certification site for more information. The discount is automatically applied if you were successfully verified from SheerID when you applied for a student license. If the discount does not work, please feel free to reach out to tft@tableau.com for a discount code. In the case of a discount error, please wait to purchase until Academic Programs has resolved the error, as retroactive discounts and refunds are not possible.

Can I use my student license as part of my internship or job?

Absolutely! No additional documentation is required.

Источник: https://www.tableau.com/academic/students

Pirate spotify premium - Free Activators -

  • cell tower

    Security

    Most SS7 exploit service providers on dark web are scammers

    The existence of Signaling System 7 (SS7) mobile telephony protocol vulnerabilities is something security researchers warned about in 2016, and it only took a year before the first attacks exploiting them were observed.

  • Hacker

    Security

    Russian ransomware gangs start collaborating with Chinese hackers

    ​There's some unusual activity brewing on Russian-speaking cybercrime forums, where hackers appear to be reaching out to Chinese counterparts for collaboration.

  • TikTok

    Security

    TikTok phishing threatens to delete influencers’ accounts

    Researchers have observed a new phishing campaign primarily targeting high-profile TikTok accounts belonging to influencers, brand consultants, production studios, and influencers' managers.

  • Cryptocurrency

    Legal, CryptoCurrency

    Victims of $2 billion BitConnect fraud to get back $57 million

    U.S. law enforcement authorities will start liquidating roughly $57 million worth of cryptocurrency seized from the now-defunct BitConnect crypto exchange to provide some restitution to defrauded investors.

  • Iran fingerprint

    Security

    US, UK warn of Iranian hackers exploiting Microsoft Exchange, Fortinet

    US, UK, and Australian cybersecurity agencies warned today of ongoing exploitation of Microsoft Exchange ProxyShell and Fortinet vulnerabilities linked to an Iranian-backed hacking group.

  • CISA

    Security

    CISA releases cybersecurity response plans for federal agencies

    The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has released new cybersecurity response plans (known as playbooks) for federal civilian executive branch (FCEB) agencies.

  • Data

    Deals

    Save 97% off a course bundle that covers all things computer science

    The 2022 Premium Computer Science Career Path Certification Bundle offers comprehensive computer science education without burning a hole in your pocket. Its courses cost $1,800 individually, but you can get them today for just $39.99.

    • BleepingComputer Deals
    • November 17, 2021
    • 07:17 AM
  • Microsoft starts rolling out a new Windows 11 media player

    Microsoft, Software

    Microsoft starts rolling out a new Windows 11 media player

    Microsoft is now rolling out a new media player that matches Windows 11's look and feel as a replacement for the Windows 10 Groove Music and (in the future) the legacy Windows Media Player app.

  • Hacker

    Security

    Threat actors offer millions for zero-days, developers talk of exploit-as-a-service

    While mostly hidden in private conversations, details sometimes emerge about the parallel economy of vulnerability exploits on underground forums, revealing just how fat of a wallet some threat actors have.

  • Windows 11 bug break glass

    Microsoft

    Windows 11 issue with Intel audio drivers triggers blue screens

    Microsoft has confirmed a new known issue impacting Windows 11 customers and triggering to blue screens of death (BSODs) on affected systems.

  • Emotet

    Security

    Here are the new Emotet spam campaigns hitting mailboxes worldwide

    The Emotet malware kicked into action yesterday after a ten-month hiatus with multiple spam campaigns delivering malicious documents to mailboxes worldwide.

  • Windows 10

    Microsoft

    Windows 10 21H2 is released, here are the new features

    Microsoft has released Windows 10 21H2, also known as the November 2021 Update, and it is available to users running Windows 10 2004 or later as an optional update in Windows Update.

  • Google Chrome Flare

    Google, Software

    Google Chrome 96 breaks Twitter, Discord, video rendering and more

    Google Chrome 96 was released yesterday, and users are reporting problems with Twitter, Discord, and Instagram caused by the new version.

  • Iran Flag

    Security, Microsoft

    Microsoft warns of the evolution of six Iranian hacking groups

    The Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center (MSTIC) has presented an analysis of the evolution of several Iranian threat actors at the CyberWarCon 2021, and their findings show increasingly sophisticated attacks.

  • WordPress

    Security

    WordPress sites are being hacked in fake ransomware attacks

    A new wave of attacks starting late last week has hacked close to 300 WordPress sites to display fake encryption notices, trying to trick the site owners into paying 0.1 bitcoin for restoration.

  • washing_machine

    Security

    These are the cryptomixers hackers use to clean their ransoms

    Cryptomixers have always been at the epicenter of cybercrime activity, allowing hackers to "clean" cryptocurrency stolen from victims and making it hard for law enforcement to track them.

  • Artificial Intelligence AI

    Microsoft, Security

    Microsoft adds AI-driven ransomware protection to Defender

    Microsoft has introduced an AI-driven ransomware attack detection system for Microsoft Defender for Endpoint customers that complements existing cloud protection by evaluating risks and blocking actors at the perimeter.

  • NPM

    Security

    NPM fixes private package names leak, serious authorization bug

    The largest software registry of Node.js packages, npm, has disclosed fixing multiple security flaws. The first flaw concerns leak of names of private npm packages on the npmjs.com's "replica" server. Whereas, the second flaw allows attackers to publish new versions of any existing npm package that they do not own or have rights to.

  • IT Courses programming

    Deals

    This jam packed course bundle teaches programming for $45

    The 2022 All-in-One Learn to Code Certification Bundle, you can hone your tech skills and pile up your expertise with 15 premium courses that focus on various languages and tech concepts, including NFT, JavaScript, DApp, and AWS. The collection is worth $3,000 altogether, but you can get it today for just $44.99.

    • BleepingComputer Deals
    • November 16, 2021
    • 07:34 AM
  • hammers

    Security, Hardware

    New Rowhammer technique bypasses existing DDR4 memory defenses

    Researchers have developed a new fuzzing-based technique called 'Blacksmith' that revives Rowhammer vulnerability attacks against modern DRAM devices that bypasses existing mitigations.

View More
Источник: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/

One-minute review

Our favorite music streaming service is Spotify. First launched in 2008, it has a library of more than 70 million tracks and 2.2 million podcasts. It’s no surprise, then, that it also has 354 million users globally. 

In a time when an increasing number of folk are choosing to stream media – music, movies, TV shows – rather than buy it, Spotify has the music streaming space covered. 

However, Spotify is more than just a sizable catalogue of tracks and podcasts. It has an intuitive interface, a fantastic recommendation engine powering its customized playlists, new features added all the time, social tools that make sharing easy, plus you can use it almost anywhere through almost any device.

That’s not to say the service doesn’t have fierce competition. Tidal is a solid alternative for those who want audiophile-grade sound. Apple Music makes sense for Apple lovers. There’s also Deezer, YouTube Music and Amazon Music Unlimited, as well as platforms that offer artists greater control, such as Bandcamp and SoundCloud

All that said, Spotify is still the king of music streaming. 

Although Spotify’s core features – a great catalogue, intuitive experience, affordable price plan – make it a fantastic service, the platform stands out for its constant innovation by way of new features, redesigns, customized playlists and even new offerings such as Spotify Lite and Spotify HiFi. These improvements are rolled out regularly and ensure it’s truly offering the best experience for everyone. 

With Spotify’s excellent catalogue, move into podcasts, major exclusives, constant improvements to all aspects of the platform and customized playlists that continue to delight users (and prove the Spotify algorithm knows their tastes better than they do), we think it’s one of the very best options for a music streaming service today.

[Update: Spotify subscriptions are now more expensive in the US and UK.

The biggest price jump is coming to Premium Family, which is rising from $14.99 / £14.99 to $15.99 / £16.99 per month. Spotify says that this is "so we can continue to bring you new content and features that you can enjoy as a family and as individuals". 

While the Family plan is the only affected service in the US, the price of a monthly subscription is being increased across the board in the UK: Premium Student is being raised from £4.99 to £5.99, and Premium Duo is going from £12.99 to £13.99. 

Spotify Premium remains unchanged, and still costs $9.99 / £9.99 per month in both regions.]

What is Spotify?

Spotify is a music streaming platform. This means you can use it to find tracks, albums and podcasts and, through a data or Wi-Fi connection, play them. You can also create playlists of tracks, save your favorite songs into a library, and even download them to your device so you can listen when you’re offline.

Offering plenty of search features, it also provides a good way to discover new music. However, its appeal for many is in its recommendations. This makes it ideal for anyone who wants to get on with working, partying or chilling out, without having to consider the track you should play next. Spotify decides for you – and often, its choices are spot on. 

Spotify is also known for its smart ideas, adding new services, rolling out redesigns and creating big, viral sharing campaigns – such as Spotify Wrapped. The company has also been working on Spotify Lite – a simpler version of the Spotify app that uses less storage, data and battery to optimize performance, making it ideal for older devices and operating systems.

What we’re saying is Spotify is so much more than a music library. It has plenty to offer and new features are being added all the time. 

Spotify: pricing and subscription

You can pay for a Spotify subscription or use Spotify for free. You’ll always get a better experience from a pay-for service, but Spotify’s free offering is decent. 

While it’s called ‘free’, the reality is it isn’t; it’s ad-supported. Companies pay Spotify to give you the luxury of listening for free so you’ll listen to their ads. But Spotify still wants you to be a paying subscriber, which is the reason the free experience isn’t top-notch.

A free subscription allows you to play any track, album or playlist at any time and in any order, which is good. But every few songs, you’ll hear an ad, which you can’t skip.

Using the Spotify app on mobile with a free account, you can pick 15 playlists featuring 750 tracks in total. You can’t freely skip the tracks in these playlists and there will be ads to contend with here, too.

If you’re only a casual listener, the free version might work for you. But for most people, a Spotify subscription is more than worth it. This costs $9.99 / £9.99 / AU$11.99 a month and gets you unlimited access to Spotify on your laptop, phone and tablet. 

More recently, Spotify has added Premium Duo. This is designed for couples or two friends. It’s $12.99 / £13.99 / AU$15.99 a month for two accounts. You get all the perks of premium Spotify as well as Duo Mix, a playlist for two that’s regularly updated with music you’ll both enjoy. 

One of the best bits about a premium account is that you can download tracks to three devices at a time for offline playback, too, which turns Spotify from an online streaming platform into a solid music service.  

If there are a few of you in your household then you can save a lot of money with a Spotify Premium Family account. This costs $15.99 / £16.99 / AU$18.99 a month but lets up to six people connect to Spotify at the same time. If you try to share a standard account then you'll be bumped off as soon as someone else tries to play a song. 

With a Spotify Premium Family subscription, you can also access Spotify Kids. This is an app designed for children aged three and up, which is private and features kid-friendly tracks, singalongs and movie soundtracks. 

Spotify: music catalogue

Spotify regularly posts updates about just how many millions of tracks it has in its library. At the time of writing, that number is 70 million.

Over the years, several artists have withdrawn their music from Spotify, including The Beatles, Taylor Swift, Jay-Z and Thom Yorke. Although, the last time we checked, most of the artists who removed their music in the early days can now be found on Spotify. 

The reasons for withdrawing their music were varied, but Spotify has been criticized in the past for not compensating artists as fully as it could. An argument in favor of Spotify is that it moves people away from piracy and allows them to discover new music and artists. However, some people still choose to avoid Spotify and either buy music outright or use services such as Tidal and Bandcamp, which give artists more autonomy and royalties. 

Spotify: platforms

The best way to use Spotify is via an app on your desktop, phone or tablet; it works on a range of devices. iOS devices need to be running iOS 12 or above. For Android, Android OS 4.1 or above. Using a Mac? OS X 10.11 or above. And Windows desktop and laptops need to be running Windows 7 or above.

Spotify also works with some sound systems, TVs, car stereo systems and games consoles. There’s also Spotify support on wearables now, including the Apple Watch. You can check out Spotify Everywhere to see which devices are compatible.

Spotify: web player

The web player isn’t the best way to use Spotify – it doesn’t feel as slick as the app and some functionality, such as creating playlists, is possible but feels clunky. 

However, the web player lets you use the Spotify service on a laptop or desktop without installing anything. That may prove handy if you’re on a work PC and can't install apps.

For a long time, the web player didn’t work through certain browsers – but now you can use it on Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Opera and Safari. It doesn’t give you everything you’d see in the app, but most of the key things you’d need for listening when you can’t get to the app – Your Library and search, for example – are there.

Spotify: mobile app

Spotify’s apps across major platforms (iOS, Android and Windows Phone) are stable, easy to use and updated frequently to make the experience as intuitive as possible. 

Thanks to a new update, the app’s home screen displays items you’ve recently played at the top – including albums, playlists and podcasts – so you can dip back in. A new clock icon in the top right-hand corner also provides a comprehensive list of everything you’ve played recently; it’s like looking back over your browser history. 

Underneath, there are different playlists, recommendations and album suggestions personalized to you and your listening. Ours features playlists put-together for us, including Discover Weekly and a selection of Daily Mix playlists, as well as a section dedicated to new podcast episodes and new releases – this is a recent update, too – including new tracks and albums based on songs you might like. 

In the search tab, you can manually search for items in the top bar, or you can browse by genres and moods using the tiles below – think pop, workout, focus and country.

In Your Library, you’ll find all of your playlists, saved artists, albums and podcasts. You can see which of these are downloaded for offline listening; they’ll have a little green arrow next to them.

Spotify: podcasts

In a bid to become the only audio app you’ll ever need, Spotify added podcasts to its platform in 2015 – and now there’s a massive selection. With Spotify, you ‘follow’ podcasts rather than ‘subscribe’ to them, with new episodes then appearing on your home screen.

If you already have a podcast app you know and love, you might not need to use Spotify at all – we were the same. But we’ve slowly found ourself using Spotify more and more for podcasts in a bid to streamline the apps we're using, so we wouldn’t be surprised if other users gradually find themselves doing the same.

We all know Spotify is excellent at picking tracks for customized playlists, but it can also apply the same kind of algorithmic magic to your podcast tastes, suggesting ones you might like to listen to – and often it’s bang on the money. 

Spotify: Spotify Connect

Spotify Connect allows you to stream tracks from your Spotify mobile or desktop app to a Wi-Fi-enabled wireless speaker. 

Think of it as Spotify’s answer to Apple AirPlay or Google Cast. If you have a Bluetooth speaker that doesn't use Wi-Fi, it should still work since Bluetooth simply transmits all audio from your phone. Visit Spotify Everywhere and scroll down to Smart Speakers to check if yours supports Spotify Connect. 

Spotify: playlists

Like most music streaming services, Spotify allows you to create your own playlists, which you can then save in Your Library to listen to whenever you like, or download for offline listening. You can download tracks onto three separate devices at any one time, but add a fourth and it might revoke access to the first device.

You can download 3,333 tracks per device for offline listening. However, even at low quality, this might take up a chunk of your phone's internal storage, so it's worth bearing in mind before you go on an offline syncing spree.

Playlists are extremely easy to create. On the desktop app, simply drag-and-drop tracks into playlists that show up in your sidebar. In the mobile app, you can tap the three dots on any track and then add them to any playlist. 

Spotify also allows you to create collaborative playlists. This means your friends can add, remove or reorder tracks, too – this is perfect for parties.

Even if you don’t want to make playlists, there are lots of ways to manage your music. For example, a new feature coming soon will let you categorize tracks in your 'Liked Songs' collection by genre and mood, so you can easily find the perfect soundtrack to your day, rather than listening through your entire eclectic catalogue of saved tracks. Spotify is really geared up for music nerds who want to organize their music.

Источник: https://www.techradar.com/reviews/spotify

Spotify premium ios download

With Spotify, you can play millions of songs and podcasts for free. Listen to the songs and podcasts you love and find music from all over the world. • Discover 

10 Oct 2019 Learn How to Download Spotify++ in iOS 13/ iOS 12 to get Spotify Premium Free on iOS 13 or iOS 12. Spotify is one of the best apps for 

Download and Install Latest Working Spotify++ on your Android as well as iOS Smartphone in 2019. Spotify++ Latest Crack Mod for iOS without TUTU geeks10.com

Download Spotify Premium Gratis iPhone – Bosan dengar lagu dari spotify banyak iklan dan banyak limitnya? Mau yang premium tapi gak mau ngeluarin uang  10 Mar 2018 Fortunately, there may be a tweak named Spotify++ that allow you to get Spotify premium for absolutely free. Spotify has two methods to pay  6 Jan 2020 With Spotify Premium, you can download songs, you won't be One way to enjoy Spotify Premium Free iOS 13 is to use an installer app to get  Then tap on the download button given above After that click on the install to install spotify++ ipa file on your iOS device. all premium features of Spotify app and  Stream, download, and discover your music with Spotify for iPhone. a free tier that's actually usable without restrictions, a Premium tier that gives so much for 

Podcasts. Download Spotify: Music and Podcasts and enjoy it on your iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch. Listen absolutely free with ads, or get Spotify Premium. 29 Nov 2019 Spotify Free users now can get 3 months free trial or 30 days free trial to feel the power of Spotify Premium, such as downloading Spotify music,  2 Oct 2019 Get a Rich Music Experience with Spotify++

5 Myths About Spotify You Probably Believe... Busted

When was the last time you downloaded music from iTunes or Amazon? Do you load up a CD when you need some tunes on a long car trip?

Of course not. Instead, you almost certainly get your music through Spotify or another something similar. Since the rise of streaming music services (fronted by Spotify) in the early 2010s, paid downloads have declined greatly. Many people will tell you that Spotify is evil and is causing the death of the music industry, but those claims are overblown.

Let's discuss some of the biggest misconceptions about Spotify and reveal the truth.

Myth 1: Spotify Doesn't Pay Artists

If you've heard a single criticism against Spotify, it's probably this. Since the service became popular, critics have claimed that Spotify doesn't properly compensate artists for their content. While Spotify's base payment might sound low at first glance, it's important to review where that money actually goes.

Obviously but importantly, Spotify does pay artists. Just because the service is "free" to non-Premium subscribers doesn't mean that free users aren't paying in some way. Those who assume because you can just download Spotify and start listening to music that it's equivalent to piracy services like LimeWire haven't done their basic research. If you're a Premium subscriber, Spotify uses your monthly fee to pay out what it owes. Free users see ads instead, and those ads generate revenue that Spotify uses in lieu of payment.

Spotify used to feature a page on its site that detailed how it pays artists, but it's no longer up. The exact payments Spotify doles out hinge on a number of factors, but as best we know it averages between $0.006 and $0.0084 per stream. Compare this to Apple's iTunes, where most songs costs $1.29. Apple takes a 30 percent cut of all sales, meaning that at best, an artist would make about 90 cents on one song download. This makes less than one cent per stream sound like a destitute wage, but consider how people use streaming services.

Recounting My Personal Experience

My favorite band is The Classic Crime. I've listened to them since before I first became a Spotify user. Whenever they release a new album, I listen to it on Spotify because that's the central location where I get all my music from. For the foreseeable future, I'll continue to stream their music regularly, and I've already listened to every one of their albums dozens of times.

The Classic Crime has already made more money from me than if I'd simply bought each album once. Further, I've supported their newer albums on Kickstarter, which also provides them with income (by the way, Kickstarter also takes a cut of projects, and you don't see anyone complaining about how that hurts the music industry).

Simply put, a band's fans will financially support them the same through Spotify as they would through buying CDs or with iTunes downloads. If you wouldn't spend $10 to download a band's album, you're not going to give them too many Spotify listens, either.

This is all foregoing the fact that in most cases, record companies are the rights holders that Spotify pays out to. These go-betweens take some of the profits, too. Unfortunately, this is a reality of the music industry and is the same anywhere -- it's not Spotify's problem. The company has a contract to pay out a certain amount to whomever owns the rights to the song. If a band has a contract with a record label, then the label has a legal right to that money. Independent bands take more of the profits since they don't have to deal with the middle man.

For a detailed breakdown of why streaming royalties are complicated, see this Quora post.

Myth 2: Spotify Harms the Music Industry

We've confirmed that artists make money from Spotify, but what about the music industry at large? Taylor Swift claimed that Spotify is awful and pulled her music from the service, while The Beatles released their entire catalog to streaming services at the end of 2015. What do these two different approaches show about Spotify's effect on the industry?

Consider that Spotify has given people less of a reason to pirate music. In the early days of iTunes, your choices were to pay for a download or go the piracy route. Now, it only takes a few minutes to download Spotify, start an account, and listen to all the music you want. Even if people only casually listen to music on Spotify, that's a legitimate use that benefits both the artists and the industry. It's far healthier than the now-defunct Grooveshark, which many people used to illegally stream music for a decade.

It's important to remember that many other mediums are trending towards streaming instead of ownership. Netflix lets you stream movies and PlayStation Now can stream PS4 games to your PC. In both cases, you don't own the media that you're consuming. It's licensed for your use as long as you're a paying customer. Streaming hasn't killed either of those industries -- actually, they're adapting as the times change.

Additionally, Spotify gives smaller artists a better chance to break out than they'd have without it. Bands can link to their Spotify pages and playlists from anywhere -- sending them to friends is an easy way to get their music out there. Further, Spotify's regularly-updated playlists often feature up-and-coming artists. If a band gets their music selected for one of these mixes, they could see a great boost in popularity.

Myth 3: Spotify Has Totally Stopped Piracy

While Spotify has provided a wholesome alternative to stealing music, the problem isn't going away anytime soon. Many people are happy to pay for a streaming subscription or live with ads in their music, but others aren't for a couple of different reasons.

Although Spotify is good at bringing new releases to its catalog right away, sometimes users have to wait a while.

When Kanye West released his album The Life of Pablo, he restricted it to the problematic Tidal service, stating that he would never release it anywhere else. Pablo didn't come to Spotify for another 45 days after the album's initial release. This means that Spotify subscribers who wanted to hear the album had to either pay up for the additional subscription or listen to it via other means -- like piracy. That's how over 500,000 people first listened to the record.

Spotify doesn't have every music track known to man, so listeners who want to keep all their music in one place are likely to pirate the missing music and import it into Spotify manually. And it's an unfortunate fact that we'll always have people who pirate no matter what honest options are available. Whether they want to own music without paying for it or just don't give a damn about the artist making money, Spotify isn't going to tempt them away.

Similarly, while listening to music on YouTube isn't ideal, people have uploaded thousands of albums to YouTube for anyone to access. If the uploader doesn't hold the rights to the music, doing so is creating an illegal copy and breaking the law.

Myth 4: Listening to Spotify Is Worse Than Vinyl

Since Spotify music streams to your computer instead of playing locally, its quality varies with the bitrate. On the desktop app, the Standard setting for free users is 160 Kbps, while premium users can enjoy High quality at 320 Kbps. There are some people who say listening to music on vinyl is better than getting your music digitally because of the quality, but this isn't true.

Vinyl audio is uncompressed analog sound as opposed to Spotify's compressed, digital sound, and music purists insist that it's better. But can you really tell the difference? You might notice some dips at Normal quality, but you'd be hard-pressed to find someone who can tell the difference between a vinyl record and a high-quality Spotify stream. A good pair of headphones with Spotify lets you enjoy your music cleanly, and comes without the crackle sound that some of us find annoying.

Aside from pure quality, Spotify's digital music offers a ton of benefits over vinyl. Records aren't portable, require flipping to hear the entire album, and can cost $20 or more. A $10 Premium payment gets you a month of unlimited access to anything you want to listen to -- why would you pay double that for one album?

Myth 5: Spotify Is Faultless

After the above discussions, you might get the impression that we view Spotify as faultless -- this isn't so. While we think Premium is a worth the cost and love the new Discover features that help you find new music, it's an unfortunate truth that Spotify's user experience has gone downhill recently.

Spotify has removed a lot of features that were awesome for power users. It used to have an Apps section where you could download utilities to discover new music or look up lyrics right inside the Spotify window. After the Apps went away, Spotify integrated the Musixmatch service so you could still view lyrics in real-time. Then that suddenly disappeared, so now users are stuck looking up lyrics in another browser window.

The service has its own set of annoying errors that crop up sometimes. Last year, it also had a brief stint where ads were serving up malware. We've mentioned the holes in its catalog that you'll probably run into at some point. And don't even get us started on how lousy the new Spotify Web Player is.

What Do You Think You Know About Spotify?

We've discussed five myths that many people, including you, probably believe about Spotify. Whether you're a streaming aficionado and get all your music through the service or scoff at the idea of buying anything but physical records, there's something to learn here.

For me personally, Spotify provides a great value to access all the music I could want with the peace of mind that comes from knowing I'm supporting artists. It may be far from perfect, but it's the best way I can think of to listen to music right now.

Interested in a similar service? Check out our comparison of Spotify, Google Play Music, and Apple Music.

Are there any myths that you have heard about Spotify? What did you do to debunk them? What do you wish people would understand about the streaming service? Are you happy with the overall Spotify experience? Please add your thoughts in the comments below!

15 Windows Command Prompt (CMD) Commands You Must Know

The command prompt is still a powerful Windows tool. Here are the most useful CMD commands every Windows user needs to know.

Read Next

ShareTweetEmail

About The Author
Ben Stegner (1784 Articles Published)

Ben is a Deputy Editor and the Onboarding Manager at MakeUseOf. He left his IT job to write full-time in 2016 and has never looked back. He's been covering tech tutorials, video game recommendations, and more as a professional writer for over seven years.

More From Ben Stegner

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter for tech tips, reviews, free ebooks, and exclusive deals!

Click here to subscribe

Источник: https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/myths-about-spotify-busted/
Download from Ignition on iOS. If you love good music then you must know about Spotify. To enjoy Spotify for free on your IOS you need to download the Spotify premium  20 Sep 2019 Interested to download Spotify++ Premium Free on iOS 13 without $9.99 a month subscription. Discover how to get premium Spotify without PC. Spotify Premium Apk is out for both Android and iOS, Spotify Apk containing lot of features such as Spotify Connect, Ads Blocked, Unlimited Shuffle. Download TuTuApp on iOS (Mobile Config Here you can read more about Spotify++.

CHECK OUT!! Free Download latest version of Spotify Preium apk 2019/2020. Which can work offline mode with no root for android and IOS. 3 days ago The TweakBox app has been updated to support the new iOS 13 firmware from Want a completely free way of downloading all your favorite 3rd-party apps and games? I'm trying to get Spotify in iOS 13 and I can't get it. With Spotify, you can play millions of songs and podcasts for free. Listen to the songs and podcasts you love and find music from all over the world. • Discover  14 Jan 2019 This step by step guide covers how to sign up and pay for Spotify Premium with the iOS app on iPhone, iPad, and desktop computers. 19 Aug 2019 How to sign up for Spotify Premium on your iPhone or desktop and a subscription to Spotify Premium allows you to download any song to  4 days ago Spotify Premium Crack 2020 + Activation Key Free Download Discover Weekly playlists; Music tracks can on the iOS lock screen and control  6 Dec 2019 Spotify Music iPhone- / iPad-App 8.5.34 Deutsch: Mit der iOS und iPad kostenlos nutzen, wer werbefreien Zugang mit mehr Premium-Extras 

Want to know how to download Spotify ++ iOS 13/ iOS 12 or want to get Spotify premium for free? Both answers are included here, about downloading Spotify.

Spotify Premium Apk is out for both Android and iOS, Spotify Apk containing lot of features such as Spotify Connect, Ads Blocked, Unlimited ShuffleDownload Spotify++ iOS/Android APK - Free Spotify Premium With…https://youtube.com/watchPřed měsícem27 tis. zhlédnutíDownload Spotify++ iOS/Android APK - Free Spotify Premium With Spotify ++ No Tweakbox Hey guys thanks for tuning in spotify ++ tutorial. Today I will show yoSpotify Premium APK Free Download v8.5.27.895 [December-2019]https://spotifyfm.netDownload Free Latest Version of Spotify Premium APK 2019 On Your android, ios, windows Device. Enjoy your free Unlimited Music Without Ads [No Root require]Spotify Premium - Download APK for Android, PC, and iOShttps://butrint.org/spotify-premiumSpotify is now offered on Mac or Windows, Android, iOS and also Windows Phone. We will give you a connect to download and install Free Spotify Premium as well to Download Spotify Free variation for your gadgets. Download Spotify Premium APK latest version free for Android and iOS. We have shared the working link of the Spotify Apk on our site with all features. Want to know how to download Spotify ++ iOS 13/ iOS 12 or want to get Spotify premium for free? Both answers are included here, about downloading Spotify. I will show you how to get Spotify++ with tutuapp on iOS devices for free. Spotify++ is a tweaked application of Spotify and it provides the premium features for free. Spotify Premium for Free on iOS(iPhone/iPad) Without Jailbreak is now quite easy with Spotify Plus Application. Download Spotify Premium Apk 8.5.6.673 latest version for Android. Tap on this Fastest link & get Spotify Premium FREE without root. (100% working)


Источник: https://cdndocsdgry.web.app/spotify-premium-ios-download-liki.html
pirate spotify premium  - Free Activators

Notice: Undefined variable: z_bot in /sites/healthplum.us/free-activators/pirate-spotify-premium-free-activators.php on line 107

Notice: Undefined variable: z_empty in /sites/healthplum.us/free-activators/pirate-spotify-premium-free-activators.php on line 107

2 Replies to “Pirate spotify premium - Free Activators”

  1. В @PapaintionВ  wait which comment are you trying to reply to? we really need to be able to respond to comment instead of people

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *